Project Delivery System Selection using the AHP Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
Received: 28 October 2024 | Revised: 21 November 2024 | Accepted: 25 November 2024 | Online: 2 February 2025
Corresponding author: Alaa Kharbat Shadhar
Abstract
This study aims to select the most suitable project delivery method for the implementation of construction projects in Iraq. The descriptive analytical approach was used to determine the importance of the criteria considered in this study, namely cost, project duration, and quality, according to owners, contractors, and consultants. A field study was used utilizing questionnaire survey and interviews to determine the degree of importance of these criteria. Then, data regarding 28 projects for the period from 2022 to 2024 were was collected to measure the performance of these criteria. Univariate data analyses were performed to assess the performance of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) along with the deriving priority scales based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) theory. The results of the AHP indicate that the IPD system ranked first with a preference rate of 34.5%.
Keywords:
integrated project delivery system, AHP, MCDMDownloads
References
A. Engebo, O. Laedre, B. Young, P. F. Larssen, J. Lohne, and O. J. Klakegg, "Collaborative project delivery methods: a scoping review," Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 278–303, Mar. 2020.
J. B. Miller, M. J. Garvin, C. W. Ibbs, and S. E. Mahoney, "Toward a New Paradigm: Simultaneous Use of Multiple Project Delivery Methods," Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 58–67, May 2000.
A. K. Shadhar, A. M. R. Mahjoob, and B. B. Mahmood, "Comparing Between Traditional and Integrated Project Delivery Systems Attributes for Optimizing Project Performanc." 2022.
Y. Q. Chen, J. Y. Liu, B. Li, and B. Lin, "Project delivery system selection of construction projects in China," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5456–5462, May 2011.
E. Bingham, G. E. Gibson, and M. E. Asmar, "Measuring User Perceptions of Popular Transportation Project Delivery Methods Using Least Significant Difference Intervals and Multiple Range Tests," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 144, no. 6, Jun. 2018, Art. no. 04018033.
S.-W. Whang, K. S. Park, and S. Kim, "Critical success factors for implementing integrated construction project delivery," Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2432–2446, Jul. 2019.
A. M. Raouf and S. G. Al-Ghamdi, "Effectiveness of Project Delivery Systems in Executing Green Buildings," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 145, no. 10, Oct. 2019, Art. no. 03119005.
H. Moon, M. Park, Y. Ahn, and N. Kwon, "Moderating Effect of Project Type on the Relationship between Project Delivery Systems and Cost Performance," Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 39, no. 1, Jan. 2023, Art. no. 04022066.
J. Laurent and R. M. Leicht, "Practices for Designing Cross-Functional Teams for Integrated Project Delivery," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 145, no. 3, Mar. 2019, Art. no. 05019001.
W. Lu, Y. Hua, and S. Zhang, "Logistic regression analysis for factors influencing cost performance of design-bid-build and design-build projects," Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 118–132, Jan. 2017.
M.-R. Pooyan, A. Al-Sakkaf, E. M. Abdelkader, T. Zayed, and G. Gopakumar, "An Integrated Framework for Selecting the Optimum Project Delivery System in Post-conflict Construction Projects," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1359–1384, Aug. 2023.
M. Khanzadi, F. Nasirzadeh, S. M. H. Hassani, and N. Nejad Mohtashemi, "An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making approach for project delivery system selection," Scientia Iranica, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 802–814, Jun. 2016.
J.-W. Zhu, L.-N. Zhou, L. Li, and W. Ali, "Decision Simulation of Construction Project Delivery System under the Sustainable Construction Project Management," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 6, Jan. 2020, Art. no. 2202.
R. Maya, B. Hassan, and A. Hassan, "Develop an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict construction projects performance in Syria," Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 366–371, Sep. 2023.
A. Kharbat Shadhar, B. Basheer Mahmood, and M. Hashim Al Quraishi, "A Novel Methodology for Predicting Roadway Deterioration in Iraq," International Journal of Engineering, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41–49, Jan. 2023.
N. N. Abbas and A. M. Burhan, "Investigating the Causes of Poor Cost Control in Iraqi Construction Projects," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8075–8079, Feb. 2022.
O. A. Al-Juboori, H. A. Rashid, and A. M. R. Mahjoob, "Investigating the Critical Success Factors for Water Supply Projects: Case of Iraq," Civil and Environmental Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 438–449, Dec. 2021.
T. L. Saaty, "Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 85–91, Feb. 2003.
A. K. Shadhar and A. M. Raoof Mahjoob, "Pavement Maintenance Management Using Multi-objective Optimization: (Case Study: Wasit Governorate-Iraq)," International Journal of Engineering, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2155–2161, Nov. 2020.
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Buroog Basheer Mahmood, Alaa Kharbat Shadhar, Ihsan Ali Husain, Ahmed Mohammed Raoof Mahjoob

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after its publication in ETASR with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.