A Comparative Study of Construction Waste Generation Rate Based on Different Construction Methods on Construction Project in Malaysia
High construction waste (CW) generation in Malaysia has serious impacts although there are very little available data regarding the relevant issue in Malaysia. This lack of data results in improper CW management and CW disposal without proper control measures. To control the implications of CW, it is very important to understand their quantity which is currently unknown. Past researches in Malaysia, found that CW generation was affected by construction methods (CMs) practiced on site. The aim of this study is to compare the CW generation rate between different CMs for on-going construction projects in Malaysia. Common CMs practiced in Malaysia are conventional construction method (CCM), mixed construction method (MCM) and industrialized building system (IBS). To obtain CW generation data, site visit (SV) method, which consists of direct measurement (DM) and indirect measurement (IM) is applied to this study. CCM was recorded to have the highest amount of waste (197.657 tons). IBS method records 77.188 tons and MCM 53.191 tons. Regarding the average waste generation rate (AWGR), IBS recorded a value of 0.018 tons per square meter, while MCM recorded 0.030 tons per square meter and CCM recorded the highest amount of 0.046 tons per square meter.
Keywords:construction waste generation, construction method
C. Mach, T. Fujiwara, C. S. Ho, “Construction and demolition waste generation rates for high-rise buildings in Malaysia”, Waste Management & Research, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 1224-1230, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16666944
V. W. Y. Tam, “Rate of Reusable and Recyclable Waste in Construction”, The Open Waste Management Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 28-32, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1876400201104010028
P. J. Dolan, R. G. Lampo, J. C. Dearborn, Concepts for Reuse and Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste, CERL Technical Report 99/58, US Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, 1999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA368252
H. Arslan, N. Cosgun, B. Salg, “Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Turkey”, in: Waste Management, An Intergraded Vision, InTechOpen, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/46110
S. Nagapan, I. A. Rahman, A. Asmi, N. F. Adnan, “Study of Site's Construction Waste in Batu Pahat, Johor”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 53, pp. 99-103, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.015
T. U. Ganiron Jr, “Recycling Concrete Debris from Construction and Demolition Waste”, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, Vol. 77, pp. 7-24, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijast.2015.77.02
S. Mahayuddin, J. Pereira, W. Badaruzzaman, M. Mokhtar, “Construction Waste Index for Waste Control in Residential House Project”, SB 10 New Zealand, Te Papa, New Zealand, May 26-28, 2010
R. Noor, A. Ridzuan, I. Endut, B. Noordin, Z. Shehu, A. Ghani, “The quantification of local construction waste for the current construction waste management practices: A case study in Klang Valley”, 2013 IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium, Langkawi, Malaysia, April 7-9, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560110
H. Bergsdal, R. A. Bohne, H. Brattebo, “Projection of Construction and Demolition Waste in Norway”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 27-39, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1149
U. F. A. R. Mohammed, A. S. H. Mohamed, “A Glance on Construction Solid Waste Management in Khartoum”, International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 101-106, 2016
M. A. Eusuf, M. Ibrahim, R. Islam, “The Construction And Demolition Wastes In Klang Valley, Malaysia”, Planning Malaysia Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 99-124, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v10.i3.103
R. A. Begum, C. Siwar, J. J. Pereira, A. H. Jaafar, “A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 86-98, 2006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.01.004
S. K. Lachimpadi, J. J. Pereira, M. R. Taha, M. Mokhtar, “Construction waste minimisation comparing conventional and precast construction (Mixed System and IBS) methods in high-rise buildings: A Malaysia case study”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 68, pp. 96-103, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.011
How to Cite
MetricsAbstract Views: 567
PDF Downloads: 239
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after its publication in ETASR with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.