Embodied Carbon in Concrete: Insights from Indonesia and Comparative Analysis with UK and USA

Authors

  • Militia Keintjem Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
  • Riza Suwondo Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
  • Lee Cunningham Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Habibie Razak The Institution of Engineers Indonesia (PII), Jakarta, Indonesia
Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 17737-17742 | December 2024 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8781

Abstract

Concrete is the most widely used construction material globally. However, its production, particularly that of cement, is a significant source of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, contributing to approximately 8% - 10% of the global anthropogenic CO2 emissions. This study aims to analyze and compare the embodied carbon (eCO2) of various concrete strength grades commonly utilized in Indonesia to offer insights for enhancing sustainability in the construction industry. The methodology involved designing concrete mixes according to Indonesian standards and calculating carbon emissions for each component. The findings revealed that the eCO2 in the Indonesian concrete mixes was significantly higher than that reported in the UK and US databases. This higher carbon footprint emerges primarily due to the greater cement content found in the Indonesian mixes. Nevertheless, the current study demonstrated that using fly ash as a supplementary cementitious material can substantially reduce the eCO2, with the mix containing fly ash showing a 42% reduction in emissions compared to the mix without fly ash. This research emphasizes the necessity for the Indonesian construction industry to adopt sustainable practices, including optimized mix designs and the use of low-carbon materials such as fly ash. In doing so, significant reductions in the carbon footprint of concrete can be achieved, contributing to the global efforts to mitigate climate change and to promote sustainability in construction practices.

Keywords:

climate change, portland cement, carbon dioxide equivalent, concrete

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buildings and Climate Change Summary for Decision Makers. United Nations Environment Programme, 2009.

Buildings & Climate Change industry call to action. UNEP, 2009.

B. P. Smith, "Whole-life carbon footprinting," Structural Engineer, vol. 86, pp. 15–16, Mar. 2008.

J. Anderson and R. Silman, "The role of the structural engineer in green building," The Structural Engineer, vol. 87, pp. 28–31, Feb. 2009.

G. F. Menzies, S. Turan, and P. F. G. Banfill, "Life-cycle assessment and embodied energy: a review," Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Construction Materials, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 135–143, Nov. 2007, https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.2007.160.4.135.

A. W. Ali and N. M. Fawzi, "Production of Light Weight Foam Concrete with Sustainable Materials," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 7647–7652, Oct. 2021, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4377.

E. Gartner, "Industrially interesting approaches to 'low-CO2' cements," Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1489–1498, Sep. 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021.

J. X. Peng, L. Huang, Y. B. Zhao, P. Chen, L. Zeng, and W. Zheng, "Modeling of Carbon Dioxide Measurement on Cement Plants," Advanced Materials Research, vol. 610–613, pp. 2120–2128, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.610-613.2120.

C. Li, X. Z. Gong, S. P. Cui, Z. H. Wang, Y. Zheng, and B. C. Chi, "CO2 Emissions due to Cement Manufacture," Materials Science Forum, vol. 685, pp. 181–187, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.685.181.

D. N. Huntzinger and T. D. Eatmon, "A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 668–675, May 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007.

P. J. M. Monteiro, S. A. Miller, and A. Horvath, "Towards sustainable concrete," Nature Materials, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 698–699, Jul. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4930.

Z. Cao, E. Masanet, A. Tiwari, and S. Akolawala, Decarbonizing Concrete: Deep decarbonization pathways for the cement and concrete cycle in the United States, India, and China. ClimateWorks Foundation, 2021.

J. N. Hacker, T. P. De Saulles, A. J. Minson, and M. J. Holmes, "Embodied and operational carbon dioxide emissions from housing: A case study on the effects of thermal mass and climate change," Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 375–384, Jan. 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.005.

G. P. Harrison, E. (Ned). J. Maclean, S. Karamanlis, and L. F. Ochoa, "Life cycle assessment of the transmission network in Great Britain," Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 3622–3631, Jul. 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.039.

P. Purnell, "Response to the Comment on 'Material Nature versus Structural Nurture: The Embodied Carbon of Fundamental Structural Elements'," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 3597–3598, Mar. 2012, https://doi.org/10.1021/es3007595.

P. Purnell and L. Black, "Embodied carbon dioxide in concrete: Variation with common mix design parameters," Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 874–877, Jun. 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.02.005.

G. Hammond and C. Jones, Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE). UK: University of Bath, 2008.

D. J. M. Flower and J. G. Sanjayan, "Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture," The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 282–288, Jul. 2007, https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.05.327.

Tata cara pemilihan campuran untuk beton normal, beton berat dan beton massa. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2012.

2-ACI 211.1-91 Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete. ACI Committee Report, 1991.

SNI 15-2049-2004: Semen Portland, Badan Stand. BSN, 2004.

"Embodied Carbon Footprint Database." Oct. 11, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://circularecology.com/embodied-carbon-footprint-database.html.

O. P. Gibbons and J. J. Orr, How to calculate embodied carbon (Second edition). IStructE Ltd, 2022.

NRMCA Member Industry-Average EPD for Ready Mixed Concrete. National Ready Mix Concrete Association, 2022.

Embodied Carbon Classification Scheme for Concrete. ARUP, 2023.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Keintjem, M., Suwondo, R., Cunningham, L. and Razak, H. 2024. Embodied Carbon in Concrete: Insights from Indonesia and Comparative Analysis with UK and USA. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 14, 6 (Dec. 2024), 17737–17742. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8781.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 127
PDF Downloads: 166

Metrics Information

Most read articles by the same author(s)