This is a preview and has not been published. View submission

Optimizing Runway Orientation: A Fine-Scanning Algorithm and Continuous Area Integration Approach

Authors

  • Trong Hiep Nguyen Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Transport and Communications, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Huy Khang Pham Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Transport and Communications, Hanoi, Vietnam
Volume: 16 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 35056-35063 | June 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.17706

Abstract

Optimal runway orientation is a determinant of airport operational safety and capacity, governed by the requirement to maximize the Usability Factor (UF) under adverse crosswind conditions. Traditional planning methodologies, specifically the graphical wind rose technique and some computational models, often rely on coarse 10-degree increments or linear approximations. This approach may induce a "precision gap" that fails to capture the true mathematical optimum when processing grouped meteorological data. This study introduces V-ROpt, a high-precision automated framework that utilizes Continuous Area Integration (CAI) logic to resolve the partial coverage problem within 16-direction wind sectors. By implementing an exhaustive fine-scanning algorithm at 0.5-degree resolution, the framework minimizes discretization error inherent in conventional techniques. The numerical results demonstrate that V-ROpt can identify a localized optimum representing a 1.0-degree shift from traditional 10-degree methods, achieving a marginal usability improvement of 0.03%. For complex airfield configurations, where a single runway fails to meet the required 95% UF, the proposed framework generates a portfolio of the top 5 optimal crosswind runway scenarios. The computational results demonstrate that the proposed crosswind runway orientations improved the combined UF by 6.38%-7.76% compared to the single-runway configuration, which initially provided a UF of only 91.08%. This enables planners to perform trade-off analyses between aerodynamic efficiency and physical constraints, such as terrain, obstacle limitation surfaces, or other environmental constraints.

Keywords:

runway orientation, wind coverage, usability factor, continuous area integration, grouped wind data, crosswind runway, fine-scanning

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. J. Ashford, S. Mumayiz, and P. H. Wright, Airport Engineering: Planning, Design, and Development of 21st Century Airports. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2011.

E.-S. M. Abdalla, M. Enieb, and R. N. A. E. Mohamed, "Investigation in Selecting the Optimum Airport Runway Orientation with Special Reference to Egyptian Airports," Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1261–1280, Nov. 2011.

Aerodromes: Aerodrome Design and Operations. Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, 8th ed., vol. 1. Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2018.

AC 150/5300-13B - Airport Design. Washington D.C., USA: Federal Aviation Administration, 2022.

R. de Neufville and A. Odoni, Airport Systems: Planning, Design, and Management, 2nd ed. London: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2003.

R. M. Mousa, "Enhancement of WNDROS Program for Optimization of Runway Orientation," Designing, Constructing, Maintaining, and Financing Today's Airport Projects, pp. 1–11, Apr. 2012.

X. Jia, D. Chung, J. Huang, M. Petrilli, and L. The, "ARO: Geographic Information Systems-Based System for Optimizing Airport Runway Orientation," Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 555–559, Sept. 2004.

H. Oktal and N. Yildirim, "New Model for the Optimization of Runway Orientation," Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 140, no. 3, Mar. 2014, Art. no. 04013020.

L. W. Falls and S. C. Brown, Optimum runway orientation relative to crosswinds, Technical Note TN D-6930. USA: NASA, 1972.

R. M. Horonjeff, F. X. McKelvey, W. J. Sproule, and S. Young, Planning and Design of Airports, 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2010.

S. I. Sarsam and H. A. Ateia, "Development of a Computer Program for Airport Runway Location, Orientation, and Length Design in Iraq," in Transportation and Development Institute Congress 2011, Mar. 2011, pp. 291–300.

R. Bellasio, "Analysis of wind data for airport runway design," Journal of Airline and Airport Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 97–116, Sept. 2014.

S. L. Chowhan, V. K. Kumar, and S. R. Kumar, "Runway Orientation and Designing," Indian Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 136–141, 2018.

S. Chang, "Crosswind‐based optimization of multiple runway orientations," Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 49, pp. 1–9, Jan. 2015.

All-weather operations, TCCS 19:2016/CHK. Hanoi, Vietnam: Civil Aviation Authority of Vietnam, 2016.

Aerodromes - General Requirements, TCVN 8753:2011. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam, 2011.

Aerodrome - Runway - Specification for Design, TCVN 11364:2016. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam, 2016.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
T. H. Nguyen and H. K. Pham, “Optimizing Runway Orientation: A Fine-Scanning Algorithm and Continuous Area Integration Approach”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 35056–35063, Jun. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 2
PDF Downloads: 5

Metrics Information