This is a preview and has not been published. View submission

The Influence of Particle Size on the Elastic Modulus of Rock-Fill Materials Based on Consolidation Tests

Authors

  • M. Yushar Yahya Alfarobi Department of Water Resources, Faculty of Engineering, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • M. Bisri Department of Water Resources, Faculty of Engineering, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-3626
  • Lily Montarcih Limantara Department of Water Resources, Faculty of Engineering, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Runi Asmaranto Department of Water Resources, Faculty of Engineering, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-3632
Volume: 16 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 36913-36920 | June 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.17675

Abstract

The elastic modulus is a key parameter influencing the deformation behavior of rockfill materials in Concrete Face Rockfill Dams (CFRDs), which is typically obtained from laboratory tests; however, these tests are limited by the maximum particle size, so specimen downscaling is required. This can result in a "size effect," leading to an apparent elastic modulus that does not accurately represent actual field conditions. This study analyzes the influence of maximum particle size (Dmax) on the elastic modulus of Bener CFRD andesite rockfill using consolidation testing. Five samples ranging from 10 mm to 120 mm were tested under staged loading up to 2.5 MPa. The elastic moduli were determined as the oedometer modulus (Eoed) during initial loading and the unloading–reloading modulus (Eur) during post-loading. After analyzing the results using an empirical approach, it was found that increasing Dmax leads to higher strain and significantly reduces both Eoed and Eur. Eoed values at a laboratory scale (Dmax 10-120 mm) resulted in 78.77-156.45 MPa, while under field conditions (Dmax 37.5-1000 mm) resulted in 44.71-107.35 MPa. Similarly, the Eur values in the laboratory scale range from 510.70 - 6,181.75 MPa, while the field conditions range from 61.94 - 1,636.04 MPa. An empirical relationship was established between Dmax and the elastic modulus, indicating that laboratory tests using smaller particle sizes tend to overestimate the elastic modulus compared to actual field conditions. Therefore, appropriate corrections or empirical adjustments are needed when applying the results to field conditions. This study confirmed that predicted laboratory elastic modulus values can be used as key parameters for deformation and deflection modeling of CFRD with andesite rockfill material.

Keywords:

elastic modulus, CFRD, particle size effect, maximum particle size, consolidation testing, oedometer modulus, unloading–reloading modulus

References

R. Asmaranto, P. T. Juwono, and R. N. A. Rastanto, "Linking the Reservoir Volume to the Flood Inundation Extent: A Multi-Dam Empirical Model for Indonesian Dam Safety," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 27006–27016, Oct. 2025.

Z. Xu, "Discussions on the technical issues of the construction of 300 m high CFRD," presented at the 78th International Commission on Large Dams Annual Meeting, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2010.

Bulletin 141: Concrete Face Rockfill Dams – Concepts for Design and Construction. Paris, France: ICOLD, 2010.

Y. Xiao, M. Meguid, A. Daouadji, Q. Chen, Z. Wu, and X. Jiang, "Effect of particle size on crushing and deformation behaviors of rockfill materials," Geoscience Frontiers, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 375–388, 2020.

Dokumen Spesifikasi Teknis Pembangunan Bendungan Bener. Jakarta, Indonesia: BBWS Serayu Opak, 2015.

P. Kurniawan and M. B. Hadimuljono, Applied Geotechnics for Engineers. Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2021.

Indra Karya Geotechnic Laboratory (Persero), Laboratory Test Result Report. Malang, Indonesia, 2024.

G. Hunter and R. Fell, The Deformation Behaviour of Rockfill. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales, 2002.

H. Wu, X. Gu, J. Hu, G. Deng, and F. Liu, "Investigation of compressibility of rockfill materials using DEM: Role of sample size and boundary condition," Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 176, 2024, Art. no. 106768.

N. P. Honkanadavar and K. G. Sharma, "Modeling the triaxial behavior of riverbed and rockfill materials," International Journal of Geomechanics, vol. 16, no. 6, 2016, Art. no. 04016026.

D2435 Standard Test Method for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2003.

F. P. Beer, E. R. Johnston, J. T. DeWolf, and D. F. Mazurek, Mechanics of Materials, 7th ed. New York, NY, USA, 2015.

M. A. Rai, S. Karamadibrata, and R. K. Wattimena, Mekanika Batuan. Bandung, Indonesia: Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2014.

T. Schanz, P. A. Vermeer, and P. G. Bonnier, "The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification," in Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.

B. Indraratnain, "Implications of non-linear strength criteria in the stability assessment of rockfill dams," presented at the International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, 1994, pp. 935–938.

T. Zhao and G. Hu, "Study on size effect of elastic modulus of rock considering the joint spacing," Frontiers in Materials, vol. 10, 2023.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
M. Y. Y. Alfarobi, M. Bisri, L. M. Limantara, and R. Asmaranto, “The Influence of Particle Size on the Elastic Modulus of Rock-Fill Materials Based on Consolidation Tests”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 36913–36920, Jun. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 5
PDF Downloads: 3

Metrics Information