This is a preview and has not been published. View submission

A Comparative Study of Public Network Intrusion Detection Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches

Authors

  • N. S. Vasantha Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Jain University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • R. Sukumar Centre of Research for Cyber Security (CRCE), School of Engineering and Technology, Jain University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Shridhar Allagi Department of Computer Science and Engineering, KLE Institute of Technology, Hubballi, Karnataka, India
  • Tessy Tom Centre of Research for Cyber Security (CRCE), School of Engineering and Technology, Jain University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Volume: 16 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 37252-37257 | August 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.17560

Abstract

Security in public networks has always been a challenge. With an ever-expanding landscape of cyberattacks, it is imperative to explore new/alternate mechanisms of implementing intrusion detection. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have emerged as promising for intrusion detection in the recent past, with increased efficiency. This study explores machine learning algorithms, namely Random Forest, Naive Bayes, and Decision Tree, for the detection of web-based attacks in public networks, using a combination of Principal Component Analysis and Haar Wavelet Transform for feature extraction. The results of these models are compared, and related issues and approaches to alleviate them are explored.

Keywords:

Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Random Forest (RF), Machine Learning (ML), Intrusion Detection System (IDS)

References

[1] I. Sharafaldin, A. Habibi Lashkari, and A. A. Ghorbani, "Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization," in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy, 2018, pp. 108–116.

[2] "IDS 2018." Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity, [Online]. Available: https://www.unb.ca/cic/datasets/ids-2018.html.

[3] I. Hidayat, M. Z. Ali, and A. Arshad, "Machine Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System: An Experimental Comparison," Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 88–97, July 2022.

[4] I. F. Kilincer, F. Ertam, and A. Sengur, "Machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection: Datasets and comparative study," Computer Networks, vol. 188, Apr. 2021, Art. no. 107840.

[5] S. Judy and R. Khilar, "Detection and Classification of Malware for Cyber Security using Machine Learning Algorithms," in 2023 Eighth International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (ICONSTEM), Apr. 2023, pp. 1–6.

[6] F. Ullah et al., "Cyber Security Threats Detection in Internet of Things Using Deep Learning Approach," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 124379–124389, 2019.

[7] N. Z. Gorment, A. Selamat, L. K. Cheng, and O. Krejcar, "Machine Learning Algorithm for Malware Detection: Taxonomy, Current Challenges, and Future Directions," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 141045–141089, 2023.

[8] Z. Tian, C. Luo, J. Qiu, X. Du, and M. Guizani, "A Distributed Deep Learning System for Web Attack Detection on Edge Devices," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1963–1971, Mar. 2020.

[9] E. C. Bayazit, O. K. Sahingoz, and B. Dogan, "Deep Learning based Malware Detection for Android Systems: A Comparative Analysis," Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette, vol. 30, no. 3, June 2023.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
N. S. Vasantha, R. Sukumar, S. Allagi, and T. Tom, “A Comparative Study of Public Network Intrusion Detection Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 37252–37257, Aug. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 45
PDF Downloads: 53

Metrics Information