Integrated Exergetic and Exergoeconomic Evaluation of Teak, Matoa, and Merbau Wood Waste for Charcoal Production in a Laboratory-Scale Modified Fixed-Kiln Reactor

Joni Joni; Mickael Ruben Kaiway; Enos Tambing

doi:10.48084/etasr.17450

Authors

Joni Joni Renewable Energy Engineering Department, Graduate School of Cenderawasih University, Jayapura, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-5702
Mickael Ruben Kaiway Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cenderawasih University, Jayapura, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9838-8213
Enos Tambing Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cenderawasih University, Jayapura, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8490-6933

Volume: 16 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 33931-33938 | April 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.17450

Received: 10 January 2026 | Revised: 30 January 2026 and 8 February 2026 | Accepted: 11 February 2026 | Online: 17 March 2026

Corresponding author: Joni Joni

Abstract

This study introduced a batch-level exergy-exergoeconomic diagnostic framework for evaluating charcoal production in a laboratory-scale, modified fixed-kiln reactor. Unlike yield- based or energy-only assessments, the proposed approach, considers exergy destruction and its associated economic penalty, allowing for direct comparisons of feedstock performance under identical operating and cost conditions. Three wood residues were examined: teak (Tectona grandis), matoa (Pometia pinnata), and merbau (Intsia spp.). The analysis revealed that merbau is the superior feedstock, achieving the highest exergetic efficiency (43.2%) and char yield (92.3%) at the lowest peak temperature (285°C). This is in contrast to matoa, which achieved 35.0% efficiency at 429°C, and teak, which achieved 32.4% efficiency at 374°C. Economically, the study revealed that feedstock selection significantly impacts costs: Merbau exhibited the lowest specific production cost ($1.08/kg) and the lowest cost of exergy destruction ($0.47 per batch). In contrast, teak produced the highest costs ($1.91/kg; $0.64 destruction) due to substantial internal irreversibility (82.3 MJ/batch). By linking thermodynamic irreversibility directly to cost formation, this methodology shows that maximizing the reactor temperature does not guarantee efficiency. It also provides a metric that can be used to select the most suitable feedstock for small-scale biomass carbonization systems.

Keywords:

charcoal production, exergy analysis, exergoeconomic assessment, fixed-kiln reactor, wood waste

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. J. Antal and M. Grønli, "The art, science, and technology of charcoal production," Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1619–1640, 2003.

E. N. Chidumayo and D. J. Gumbo, "The environmental impacts of charcoal production in tropical ecosystems of the world: A synthesis," Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 86–94, 2013.

A. Nahayo, I. Ekise, and A. Mukarugwiza, "Comparative study on charcoal yield produced by traditional and improved kilns: A case study of Nyaruguru and Nyamagabe Districts in Southern Province of Rwanda," Energy and Environment Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2013.

W. W. Ayass, H. Kobeissi, R. Mokdad, E. Shammas, D. Asmar, and J. Zeaiter, "Process design and operation of a wood charcoal retort," Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 2211–2220, 2018.

E. Tazebew, S. Sato, S. Addisu, E. Bekele, A. Alemu, and B. Belay, "Improving traditional charcoal production system for sustainable charcoal income and environmental benefits in highlands of Ethiopia," Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, Art. no. e19787, 2023.

A. Mencarelli, R. Greco, S. Balzan, S. Grigolato, and R. Cavalli, "Charcoal-based products combustion: Emission profiles, health exposure, and mitigation strategies," Environmental Advances, vol. 13, 2023, Art. no. 100420.

O. P. Okimiji, "Charcoal-production air pollutant impacts on ambient environment and associated health risks: A systematic review," The Global Environmental Engineers, vol. 11, pp. 13–36, 2024.

S. K. Effatpanah, M. H. Ahmadi, S. H. Delbari, and G. Lorenzini, "Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and emergy-based exergoeconomic analyses of a biomass combustion waste heat recovery organic Rankine cycle," Entropy, vol. 24, no. 2, 2022, Art. no. 209.

M. Nourpour, M. H. Khoshgoftar Manesh, A. Pirozfar, and M. Delpisheh, "Exergy, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, emergy-based assessment and advanced exergy-based analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle power plant," Energy and Environment, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 379–406, 2023.

C. Branca and C. Di Blasi, "Demineralization pretreatments for reducing biomass variability in pyrolysis," ACS Omega, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 9536–9546, 2024.

S. S. Sri Shalini, K. Palanivelu, A. Ramachandran, and V. Raghavan, "Biochar from biomass waste as a renewable carbon material for climate change mitigation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions—A review," Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2247–2267, 2021.

N. Berrocal-Mendéz and R. Moya, "Production, cost and properties of charcoal produced after logging and sawing, by the earth pit method from Tectona grandis wood residues," Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 121–132, 2022.

D. A. Gómez-González, L. A. Méndez-Duran, and H. A. Milquez-Sanabria, "Exergoeconomic evaluation of fuel production from rice husk residue through the pyrolysis process," Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, vol. 16, no. 1, 2024, Art. no. 013102.

N. Ayala-Ruíz, D. H. Malagón-Romero, and H. A. Milquez-Sanabria, "Exergoeconomic evaluation of a banana waste pyrolysis plant for biofuel production," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 359, 2022, Art. no. 132108.

S. Amid et al., "Exergetic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental aspects of an industrial-scale molasses-based ethanol production plant," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 227, 2021, Art. no. 113637.

T. Morosuk and G. Tsatsaronis, "Advanced exergy-based methods used to understand and improve energy-conversion systems," Energy, vol. 169, pp. 238–246, 2019.

T. Rodrigues, D. C. Barcellos, and A. Braghini Junior, "State of the art on development and improvement of slow carbonization kilns for charcoal production," Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 176, 2023, Art. no. 106257.

E. Torres et al., "4-E (environmental, economic, energetic and exergetic) analysis of slow pyrolysis of lignocellulosic waste," Renewable Energy, vol. 162, pp. 296–307, 2020.

A. Bejan, "Evolution in thermodynamics," Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, Art. no. 011305.

Y. Tu and G. Chen, "Rethinking loss of available work and Gouy–Stodola theorem," Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 147, no. 3, 2025.

A. S. Abdulsitar, A. F. Saeed, and H. H. Ismaeel, "A comprehensive study of energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironment analysis of combined cycle power plant," Babylonian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2025, pp. 68–90, 2025.

G. Ferrarra, M. T. Ho, A. Lanzini, P. Leone, and D. E. Wiley, "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of three different technologies for post-combustion CO₂ capture," Energy Procedia, vol. 114, pp. 6455–6464, 2017.

M. M. Hasan, M. G. Rasul, M. I. Jahirul, and M. Mofijur, "Fuelling the future: Unleashing energy and exergy efficiency from municipal green waste pyrolysis," Fuel, vol. 357, 2024, Art. no. 129815.

A. Almutairi, P. Pilidis, and N. Al-Mutawa, "Energetic and exergetic analysis of combined cycle power plant: Part 1—Operation and performance," Energies, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 14118–14135, 2015.

N. L. Panwar, A. Pawar, and B. L. Salvi, "Comprehensive review on production and utilization of biochar," SN Applied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, 2019, Art. no. 168.

Z. Getahun et al., "Towards sustainable charcoal production: Designing an economical brick kiln with enhanced emission control technology," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 6, 2024, Art. no. e27797.

F. Charvet, A. Matos, J. Figueiredo da Silva, L. Tarelho, M. Leite, and D. Neves, "Charcoal production in Portugal: Operating conditions and performance of a traditional brick kiln," Energies, vol. 15, no. 13, 2022, Art. no. 4775.

T. H. Mwampamba, M. Owen, and M. Pigaht, "Opportunities, challenges and way forward for the charcoal briquette industry in Sub-Saharan Africa," Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 158–170, 2013.

S. Sangsuk, S. Suebsiri, and P. Puakhom, "The metal kiln with heat distribution pipes for high quality charcoal and wood vinegar production," Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 47, pp. 149–157, 2018.

S. Sangsuk, C. Buathong, and S. Suebsiri, "High-energy conversion efficiency of drum kiln with heat distribution pipe for charcoal and biochar production," Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 59, pp. 1–7, 2020.

D. A. Granados, H. I. Velásquez, and F. Chejne, "Energetic and exergetic evaluation of residual biomass in a torrefaction process," Energy, vol. 74, pp. 181–189, 2014.

A. Mencarelli, R. Cavalli, R. Greco, and S. Grigolato, "Comparison of technical and operational conditions of traditional and modern charcoal kilns: A case study in Italy," Energies, vol. 16, no. 23, 202, Art. no. 77573.

E. Saniso, L. Seni, M. Hayibaka, and M. Suttikan, "Enhancing charcoal production: Improvements in the traditional brick kiln and product properties," Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2025, Art. no. 106634.

R. A. Zunaidi, D. D. Deria, K. Amiroh, and A. R. Annisa, "Financial feasibility study of briquette production from used charcoal and tree branches in Kampung Oase Ondomohen Surabaya," IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1151, no. 1, 2023, Art. no. 012041.

D. Mangallo and Joni, "The effect of clay insulator use on corn cob carbonization reactor heat loss," International Journal of Heat and Technology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 238–244, 2024.

L. C. Zulu and R. B. Richardson, "Charcoal, livelihoods, and poverty reduction: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 127–137, 2013.