Optimized Feature Extraction via Custom Low-Cost sEMG Hardware for Real-Time Myoelectric Interfaces

Authors

  • Thi-Mai-Phuong Dao School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (SEEE), Hanoi University of Industry, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Van-Kien Nguyen Technology Section, Duy Hoang High Technology Consultancy Joint Stock Company, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Ngoc-Khoat Nguyen Faculty of Control and Automation, Electric Power University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Loc Le Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, Lac Hong University, Dongnai, Vietnam
  • Tien-Dung Nguyen Faculty of Control and Automation, Electric Power University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Tri Nguyen Control Automation in Production and Improvement of Technology Institute (CAPITI), Academy of Military Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Thi-Duyen Bui Faculty of Control and Automation, Electric Power University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Duy-Trung Nguyen Faculty of Control and Automation, Electric Power University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Huu-Thang Nguyen Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Refrigeration, Thanh Hoa College of Industry, Thanh Hoa, Vietnam
Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 32186-32194 | February 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.16242

Abstract

Surface Electromyography (sEMG) is a widely used modality to infer human motor intent in Human–Machine Interaction (HMI) systems. This study presents a cost-effective, custom-fabricated sEMG acquisition module with three differential channels strategically positioned to capture bioelectric activity from key forearm muscles. The analog front-end is designed with a high-gain amplification stage (2200×) and a bandpass filter spanning 48 to 482 Hz to suppress motion artifacts and ambient noise while preserving relevant myoelectric information. Acquired signals are processed through a lightweight digital pipeline including bandpass and 50 Hz notch filtering, followed by segmentation using a 200 ms sliding window with 50% overlap to balance temporal resolution and computational efficiency. Feature extraction focuses on commonly used time-domain descriptors (MAV, WL, RMS, VAR, and IEMG) and frequency-domain features (MNF and MDF). Experimental evaluation shows that the proposed system achieves a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of 17.8–22.5 dB across three channels, while amplitude-based time-domain features (RMS and WL) exhibit less than 5% variability across repeated trials. These results indicate that the proposed hardware–software framework provides stable and reliable feature extraction suitable for real-time embedded applications. The system is therefore well-suited for wearable HMI scenarios such as myoelectric prostheses, robotic exoskeletons, and assistive robotic devices requiring low latency and low computational complexity.

Keywords:

sEMG, custom-fabricated sEMG sensor, biomedical signal processing, feature extraction

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. A. Clancy, E. L. Morin, G. Hajian, and R. Merletti, "Tutorial. Surface electromyogram (sEMG) amplitude estimation: Best practices," Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 72, Oct. 2023, Art. no. 102807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102807

N. K. Nguyen, T. M. P. Dao, T. D. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, H. T. Nguyen, and V. K. Nguyen, "An sEMG Signal-based Robotic Arm for Rehabilitation applying Fuzzy Logic," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 14287–14294, June 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7146

Q. Ai, Y. Zhang, W. Qi, Q. Liu, and A. K. Chen, "Research on Lower Limb Motion Recognition Based on Fusion of sEMG and Accelerometer Signals," Symmetry, vol. 9, no. 8, Aug. 2017, Art. no. 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9080147

X. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Yu, and C. Deng, "Decoding of lower limb continuous movement intention from multi-channel sEMG and design of adaptive exoskeleton controller," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 94, Aug. 2024, Art. no. 106245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106245

D. Borzelli, S. Pastorelli, and L. Gastaldi, "Determination of the Human Arm Stiffness Efficiency with a Two Antagonist Muscles Model," in Advances in Italian Mechanism Science, vol. 47, G. Boschetti and A. Gasparetto, Eds. Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 71–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48375-7_8

H. Hellara, R. Barioul, S. Sahnoun, A. Fakhfakh, and O. Kanoun, "Comparative Study of sEMG Feature Evaluation Methods Based on the Hand Gesture Classification Performance," Sensors, vol. 24, no. 11, June 2024, Art. no. 3638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113638

A. Leone, A. M. Carluccio, A. Caroppo, A. Manni, and G. Rescio, "A Systematic Review of Surface Electromyography in Sarcopenia: Muscles Involved, Signal Processing Techniques, Significant Features, and Artificial Intelligence Approaches," Sensors, vol. 25, no. 7, Mar. 2025, Art. no. 2122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072122

M. Al-Ayyad, H. A. Owida, R. De Fazio, B. Al-Naami, and P. Visconti, "Electromyography Monitoring Systems in Rehabilitation: A Review of Clinical Applications, Wearable Devices and Signal Acquisition Methodologies," Electronics, vol. 12, no. 7, Mar. 2023, Art. no. 1520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071520

D. Zhao et al., "Upper limb human-exoskeleton system motion state classification based on semg: application of CNN-BiLSTM-attention model," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, May 2025, Art. no. 18969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02864-5

X. Zhang, Y. Qu, G. Zhang, Z. Wang, C. Chen, and X. Xu, "Review of sEMG for Exoskeleton Robots: Motion Intention Recognition Techniques and Applications," Sensors, vol. 25, no. 8, Apr. 2025, Art. no. 2448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s25082448

Z. Mhiriz, M. Bourhaleb, and M. Rahmoune, "Leveraging Machine Learning for Signal Processing in Surface Electromyography (sEMG) for Prosthetic Control," in Digital Technologies and Applications, vol. 1098, S. Motahhir and B. Bossoufi, Eds. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 107–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68650-4_11

J. Wu, X. Li, W. Liu, and Z. Jane Wang, "sEMG Signal Processing Methods: A Review," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1237, no. 3, June 2019, Art. no. 032008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1237/3/032008

Y. Liu, X. Li, L. Yang, and H. Yu, "A Transformer-Based Gesture Prediction Model via sEMG Sensor for Human–Robot Interaction," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 73, pp. 1–15, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2024.3373045

J. W. Liang, H. W. Feng, B. Zhang, J. M. Liang, Y. W. Liu, and Z. H. Li, "A Convolutional Neural Network Classification Method Based on Non-Ideal sEMG Signals for Human-Robot Interaction System," in 2025 37th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Xiamen, China, May 2025, pp. 2474–2479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC65474.2025.11090507

I. Karacan and K. S. Türker, "A comparison of electromyography techniques: surface versus intramuscular recording," European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 7–23, Jan. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05640-x

T. Song, Z. Yan, S. Guo, Y. Li, X. Li, and F. Xi, "Review of sEMG for Robot Control: Techniques and Applications," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 17, Aug. 2023, Art. no. 9546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179546

K. Challa, I. W. AlHmoud, C. Jaiswal, A. C. Turlapaty, and B. Gokaraju, "EMG features dataset for arm activity recognition," Data in Brief, vol. 60, June 2025, Art. no. 111519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2025.111519

M. O. Arregi and E. L. Secco, "A Low-Cost EMG Graphical User Interface Controller for Robotic Hand," in Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 2, vol. 359, K. Arai, Ed. Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 459–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89880-9_35

T. W. Beck, J. M. DeFreitas, and M. S. Stock, "The Effects of a Resistance Training Program on Average Motor Unit Firing Rates.," Clinical Kinesiology (Online Edition), 2011.

I. Mendez et al., "Evaluation of the Myo armband for the classification of hand motions," in 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), London, UK, July 2017, pp. 1211–1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009414

T. Mahboob, M. Y. Chung, and K. W. Choi, "EMG-based 3D hand gesture prediction using transformer–encoder classification," ICT Express, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1047–1052, Dec. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2023.04.005

B. Chen et al., "A Real-Time EMG-Based Fixed-Bandwidth Frequency-Domain Embedded System for Robotic Hand," Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 16, June 2022, Art. no. 880073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.880073

C. J. De Luca, L. Donald Gilmore, M. Kuznetsov, and S. H. Roy, "Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination," Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1573–1579, May 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.027

J. C. Kline and C. J. De Luca, "Error reduction in EMG signal decomposition," Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 2718–2728, Dec. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00724.2013

C. Li, H. He, S. Yin, H. Deng, and Y. Zhu, "Continuous Angle Prediction of Lower Limb Knee Joint Based on sEMG," in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances in Systems Science and Engineering (RASSE), Shanghai, China, Dec. 2021, pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RASSE53195.2021.9686816

A. Bawa and K. Banitsas, "Design Validation of a Low-Cost EMG Sensor Compared to a Commercial-Based System for Measuring Muscle Activity and Fatigue," Sensors, vol. 22, no. 15, Aug. 2022, Art. no. 5799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155799

N. Nazmi, M. Abdul Rahman, S. I. Yamamoto, S. Ahmad, H. Zamzuri, and S. Mazlan, "A Review of Classification Techniques of EMG Signals during Isotonic and Isometric Contractions," Sensors, vol. 16, no. 8, Aug. 2016, Art. no. 1304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s16081304

T. R. Farrell and R. F. Weir, "The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses," IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 111–118, Mar. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2007.891391

H. Ashraf et al., "Evaluation of windowing techniques for intramuscular EMG-based diagnostic, rehabilitative and assistive devices," Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 18, no. 1, Feb. 2021, Art. no. 016017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abcc7f

F. Kulwa, O. W. Samuel, M. G. Asogbon, O. O. Obe, and G. Li, "Analyzing the Impact of Varied Window Hyper-parameters on Deep CNN for sEMG based Motion Intent Classification," in 2022 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT), Trento, Italy, June 2022, pp. 81–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroInd4.0IoT54413.2022.9831573

L. H. Smith, L. J. Hargrove, B. A. Lock, and T. A. Kuiken, "Determining the Optimal Window Length for Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control: Balancing the Competing Effects of Classification Error and Controller Delay," IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 186–192, Apr. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2100828

H. F. Hassan, S. J. Abou-Loukh, and I. K. Ibraheem, "Teleoperated robotic arm movement using electromyography signal with wearable Myo armband," Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 378–387, Sept. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2019.05.001

S. Said, Z. Albarakeh, T. Beyrouthy, S. Alkork, and A. Nait-ali, "Machine-Learning based Wearable Multi-Channel sEMG Biometrics Modality for User’s Identification," in 2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART), Paris/Créteil, France, Dec. 2021, pp. 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677744

T. Stefanou, D. Guiraud, C. Fattal, C. Azevedo-Coste, and L. Fonseca, "Frequency-Domain sEMG Classification Using a Single Sensor," Sensors, vol. 22, no. 5, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 1939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051939

C. K. Chan, G. F. Timothy, and C. H. Yeow, "Comparison of mean frequency and median frequency in evaluating muscle fiber type selection in varying gait speed across healthy young adult individuals," in 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA, Aug. 2016, pp. 1725–1728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591049

B. N. Cahyadi et al., "Analysis of EMG based Arm Movement Sequence using Mean and Median Frequency," in 2018 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), Malang, Indonesia, Oct. 2018, pp. 440–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EECSI.2018.8752777

A. Phinyomark, P. Phukpattaranont, and C. Limsakul, "Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 7420–7431, June 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.102

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
T.-M.-P. Dao, “Optimized Feature Extraction via Custom Low-Cost sEMG Hardware for Real-Time Myoelectric Interfaces”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 32186–32194, Feb. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 193
PDF Downloads: 128

Metrics Information