Segmented UAV Trajectory Optimization via Fifth-Order Polynomial Approximation and Analytical Optimal Control

Authors

  • Zarina Kutpanova Department of Computer Engineering, Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • Kenesary Suleymenov LN Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • Dinara Kozhakhmetova Department of Automation and Information Technologies, Graduate School Digital Technologies and Construction, Shakarim University, Semey, Kazakhstan
  • Praveen Kumar Department of Computer Engineering, Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • Gani Baiseitov R&D Center "Kazakhstan Engineering" LLP, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • Dmitry Shandronov Military Engineering Institute of Radio Electronics and Communications, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 32696-32703 | February 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.15905

Abstract

This study aims to optimize the flight trajectory of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) with given final conditions. An approach for constructing the optimal UAV trajectory through successive sections using a fifth-degree polynomial approximation is presented. A mathematical model is developed that considers the features of using local inertial coordinate systems on each trajectory section. A motion optimization method is proposed based on minimizing the quadratic functional that characterizes both the accuracy of reaching specified points and the energy cost for control. The solution to the optimization problem is obtained using the analytical design of the optimal controller. The analytical synthesis is novel and yields closed-form expressions for the optimal control on each segment, ensuring minimum-energy trajectories that meet the specified waypoints exactly. The proposed approach is validated through a practical example and MATLAB/Simulink simulation, demonstrating accurate and stable path-following by a UAV.

Keywords:

unmanned aerial vehicle, trajectory optimization, polynomial approximation, inertial coordinate systems, quadratic functional, Bolza problem, optimal control, segmented trajectory, analytical design

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Q. Wu, Y. Su, W. Tan, R. Zhan, J. Liu, and L. Jiang, "UAV Path Planning Trends from 2000 to 2024: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization," Drones, vol. 9, no. 2, 2025, Art. no. 128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9020128

Y. Liu, H. Zhang, H. Zheng, Q. Li, and Q. Tian, "A spherical vector-based adaptive evolutionary particle swarm optimization for UAV path planning under threat conditions," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2025, Art. no. 2116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85912-4

C. Hu, D. Liu, Z. Wang, D. Li, J. Wang, and X. Tang, "Risk-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Non-Conservative Motion Planning in Uncertain Autonomous Driving Environments," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 18880–18893, Sept. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2025.3599260

W. Giernacki, S. Stępień, M. Chodnicki, and A. Wróblewska, "Hybrid Quasi-Optimal PID-SDRE Quadrotor Control," Energies, vol. 15, no. 12, 2022, Art. no. 4312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124312

N. Basil et al., "Performance analysis of hybrid optimization approach for UAV path planning control using FOPID-TID controller and HAOAROA algorithm," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, Feb. 2025, Art. no. 4840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86803-4

A. El-alami, Y. Nadir, and K. Mansouri, "An Efficient Geometric Transformation-Based Approach for Multi-UAV Image Stitching," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 25507–25513, Aug. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11719

R. Xie, Z. Meng, L. Wang, H. Li, K. Wang, and Z. Wu, "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning Algorithm Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large-Scale and Dynamic Environments," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 24884–24900, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057485

F. Aljalaud and Y. Alohali, "Optimizing Autonomous Multi-UAV Path Planning for Inspection Missions: A Comparative Study of Genetic and Stochastic Hill Climbing Algorithms," Energies, vol. 18, no. 1, 2025, Art. no. 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18010050

B. Abhishek, S. Ranjit, T. Shankar, G. Eappen, P. Sivasankar, and A. Rajesh, "Hybrid PSO-HSA and PSO-GA algorithm for 3D path planning in autonomous UAVs," SN Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 11, Oct. 2020, Art. no. 1805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03498-0

W. Su, M. Gao, X. Gao, and Z. Xuan, "Enhanced Multi-UAV Path Planning in Complex Environments With Voronoi-Based Obstacle Modelling and Q-Learning," International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2024, no. 1, 2024, Art. no. 5114696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5114696

N. Ismail, N. L. Mohd Kamal, N. Norhashim, S. Abdul Hamid, Z. Sahwee, and S. Ahmad Shah, "Electric Propulsion and Hybrid Energy Systems for Solar-Powered UAVs: Recent Advances and Challenges," Drones, vol. 9, no. 12, Dec. 2025, Art. no. 846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9120846

G. Farid, M. Bilal, L. Zhang, A. Alharbi, I. Ahmed, and M. Azhar, "An Improved Deep Q-Learning Approach for Navigation of an Autonomous UAV Agent in 3D Obstacle-Cluttered Environment," Drones, vol. 9, no. 8, 2025, Art. no. 518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9080518

Y. Alqudsi and M. Makaraci, "UAV swarms: research, challenges, and future directions," Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, vol. 72, no. 1, Jan. 2025, Art. no. 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00582-3

Y. Zhao, Z. Zheng, and Y. Liu, "Survey on computational-intelligence-based UAV path planning," Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 158, pp. 54–64, Oct. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.033

P. Pounds, R. Mahony, and P. Corke, "Modelling and control of a large quadrotor robot," Control Engineering Practice, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 691–699, July 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2010.02.008

Y. Zhang, R. Zhao, D. Mishra, and D. W. K. Ng, "A Comprehensive Review of Energy-Efficient Techniques for UAV-Assisted Industrial Wireless Networks," Energies, vol. 17, no. 18, 2024, Art. no. 4737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184737

M. Campion, P. Ranganathan, and S. Faruque, "UAV swarm communication and control architectures: a review," Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 93–106, June 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2018-0009

M. Quiñones-Grueiro, G. Biswas, I. Ahmed, T. Darrah, and C. Kulkarni, "Online decision making and path planning framework for safe operation of unmanned aerial vehicles in urban scenarios," International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, vol. 12, no. 3, Apr. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36001/ijphm.2021.v12i3.2953

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Z. Kutpanova, K. Suleymenov, D. Kozhakhmetova, P. Kumar, G. Baiseitov, and D. Shandronov, “Segmented UAV Trajectory Optimization via Fifth-Order Polynomial Approximation and Analytical Optimal Control”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 32696–32703, Feb. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 83
PDF Downloads: 49

Metrics Information