An Experimental Evaluation of Low-Cost MQ-Series LPG Sensors under Varying Temperature Conditions

Authors

  • Lukmanul Khakim Computer Engineering Department, Universitas Harkat Negeri, Tegal City, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Ida Afriliana Computer Engineering Department, Universitas Harkat Negeri, Tegal City, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Eko Budihartono Computer Engineering Department, Universitas Harkat Negeri, Tegal City, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Amin Suharjono Department of Electrical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 31475-31483 | February 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.15843

Abstract

This study presents a comparative experimental evaluation of four low-cost MQ-series Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) sensors (MQ2, MQ4, MQ5, and MQ6) under controlled temperature variations to assess their accuracy and reliability for practical gas detection applications. Although MQ sensors are widely employed in low-cost gas monitoring systems, comprehensive comparative analyses utilizing industry-grade reference instruments remain limited, particularly under varying thermal conditions. Experiments were conducted within a temperature range of 15–31 °C, and the results were validated against the Bosean BTY-S100 reference instrument. Among the tested sensors, the MQ2 exhibited the best overall performance, achieving a high coefficient of determination (R² = 0.96), low Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 7–12, Relative Root Mean Square Error (RRMSE) of 2–7%, and deviation below 10%. These findings demonstrate that the MQ2 sensor offers superior accuracy, stability, and consistency across different temperature ranges, underscoring its potential as a reliable and cost-effective solution for practical LPG detection applications.

Keywords:

MQ-series, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), low-cost, Bosean BTY-S100, comparative evaluation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. N. Williams et al., "Sustained use of liquefied petroleum gas following one year of free fuel and behavioral support in Puno, Peru," Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 73, pp. 13–22, Apr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2023.01.005

S. K. Trivedi, A. D. Roy, P. Kumar, D. Jena, and A. Sinha, "Prediction of consumers refill frequency of LPG: A study using explainable machine learning," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 1, Jan. 2024, Art. no. e23466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23466

L. O. Ajuka, R. A. Kazeem, O. A. Kuti, T. C. Jen, A. S. Afolalu, and E. T. Akinlabi, "Decarbonized automotive fuel: Liquefied petroleum gas biosynthesis, benefits and drawbacks," Results in Engineering, vol. 21, Mar. 2024, Art. no. 101889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101889

L. Khakim, I. Afriliana, N. Nurohim, and A. Rakhman, "Alat Proteksi Kebocoran Gas LPG Rumah Tangga Berbasis Mikrokontroler," Komputika : Jurnal Sistem Komputer, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 40–47, Apr. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34010/komputika.v11i1.4977

T. Dutta, T. Noushin, S. Tabassum, and S. K. Mishra, "Road Map of Semiconductor Metal-Oxide-Based Sensors: A Review," Sensors, vol. 23, no. 15, Aug. 2023, Art. no. 6849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156849

J. Wawrzyniak, "Advancements in Improving Selectivity of Metal Oxide Semiconductor Gas Sensors Opening New Perspectives for Their Application in Food Industry," Sensors, vol. 23, no. 23, Dec. 2023, Art. no. 9548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239548

A. Nabil Abdullah, K. Kamarudin, S. Muhammad Mamduh, A. Hamid Adom, and Z. Hadi Mohd Juffry, "Effect of Environmental Temperature and Humidity on Different Metal Oxide Gas Sensors at Various Gas Concentration Levels," IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 864, no. 1, May 2020, Art. no. 012152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/864/1/012152

K. Sukhdev, P. Harinarayanan, U. S. Kumar, and P. Baburaj, "A Simplified Model for Calculating the Dependence of Ambient Temperature and Relative Humidity on Commercial Metal Oxide Chemiresistive Gas Sensors," Sensors and Materials, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 3411–3427, Sept. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM3995

A. A. Olorunkosebi et al., "Comparative investigation of gas sensing performance of liquefied petroleum gas using green reduced graphene oxide-based sensors," RSC Advances, vol. 13, no. 24, pp. 16630–16642, May 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA01684F

N. Chaurasiya et al., "A highly sensitive room temperature liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) sensor with fast response based on a titanium dioxide (TiO2)–reduced graphene oxide (r-GO) composite," Sensors & Diagnostics, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1215–1227, Sept. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SD00223J

B. C. Tladi, Z. P. Tshabalala, R. E. Kroon, H. C. Swart, and D. E. Motaung, "Influence of reduced graphene oxide layer on sensing characteristics of Co3O4/rGO nanocomposite towards Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)," Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 1007, Dec. 2024, Art. no. 176464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.176464

X. Tian et al., "Recent advances in MoS2-based nanomaterial sensors for room-temperature gas detection: a review," Sensors & Diagnostics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 361–381, Mar. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SD00208F

T. Li et al., "The Combination of Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials with Metal Oxide Nanoparticles for Gas Sensors: A Review," Nanomaterials, vol. 12, no. 6, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060982

B. F. Alshammari and M. T. Chughtai, "IoT Gas Leakage Detector and Warning Generator," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 6142–6146, Aug. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3712

"BT-S100 Gas Leak Detector." Boseantech. https://www.boseantech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/BT-S100.pdf.

"Technical Data: MQ-2 Gas Sensor." Haoyuelectronics. https://www.haoyuelectronics.com/Attachment/MQ-2/MQ-2.pdf.

B. Kommey, D. Opoku, J. Lartey, K. Kumah, and M. Tantuo, "A Simple, Low-cost, Efficient and Smart Consumer Gas Leakage Detection System," International Journal of Informatics, Information System and Computer Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 105–123, June 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34010/injiiscom.v3i1.8371

"Technical Data: MQ-4 Gas Sensor." Sparkfun. https://cdn.sparkfun.com/assets/e/f/c/7/d/MQ-4.pdf.

D. A. H. Fakra, D. A. S. Andriatoavina, N. A. M. N. Razafindralambo, K. abdallah Amarillis, and J. M. M. Andriamampianina, "A simple and low-cost integrative sensor system for methane and hydrogen measurement," Sensors International, vol. 1, Jan. 2020, Art. no. 100032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100032

"Technical Data: MQ-5 Gas Sensor." Seeedstudio. https://files.seeedstudio.com/wiki/Grove-Gas_Sensor-MQ5/res/MQ-5.pdf.

H. Alam, "A Design Of Automatic Safety Equipment For Lpg Gas Stoves Based On Atmega 8 Microcontroller," Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika dan Sains, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 385–392, Sept. 2023.

"Technical Data: MQ-6 Gas Sensor." Meterkala. https://www.meterkala.com/media/uploads/files/products/MQ6.pdf.

M. M. Khan, "Sensor-Based Gas Leakage Detector System," Engineering Proceedings, vol. 2, no. 1, Nov. 2020, Art. no. 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-7-08278

A. T. Ajiboye, J. F. Opadiji, A. O. Yusuf, and J. ). Popoola, "Analytical determination of load resistance value for MQ-series gas sensors: MQ-6 as case study," TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 575–582, Apr. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v19i2.17427

A. Gadoum and D. Benyoucef, "Monte Carlo Modeling and Simulation of Electron Dynamics in Low Temperature Methane Gas," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 18153–18159, Dec. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8712

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
L. Khakim, I. Afriliana, E. Budihartono, and A. Suharjono, “An Experimental Evaluation of Low-Cost MQ-Series LPG Sensors under Varying Temperature Conditions”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 31475–31483, Feb. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 351
PDF Downloads: 148

Metrics Information