Optimal Location and Sizing of Distributed Generation Units Using NSAGA-III with Heuristic Sampling and Restricted Mating

Authors

  • Huynh Tuyet Vy Faculty of Electronic Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Ho Pham Huy Anh Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), 268 Ly Thuong Kiet Street, Dien Hong Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam | Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM), Dong Hoa Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 31294-31302 | February 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.15729

Abstract

The integration of Distributed Generation (DG) units in distribution systems is a well-known approach to minimize power losses and improve voltage stability. This research proposes an improved Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA)-III framework incorporating Heuristic Sampling (HS) for initialization and Restricted Mating (RM) to enhance diversity preservation. The method is benchmarked against the classical NSGA-II, NSGA-III, CMOPSO, and CTAEA methods on the standard IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus test systems. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed NSGA3-seeded method produces smoother and better-converged Pareto fronts with more uniform solution distribution. Quantitative evaluations using Hypervolume (HV), Generational Distance (GD), and Spacing-to-Extent (StE) indicators confirm consistent improvements in convergence and diversity. Furthermore, the Friedman statistical test confirms that the performance differences among algorithms are statistically significant (p < 0.05), and that the proposed NSGA3-seeded consistently attains the best overall ranking across all indicators. The findings confirm the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed approach for practical DG siting and sizing problems.

Keywords:

optimal distributed generator allocation, NSGA, CTAEA, heuristic sampling, restricted mating, IEEE distribution systems

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. M. Tercan, A. Demirci, Y. E. Unutmaz, O. Elma, and R. Yumurtaci, "A comprehensive review of recent advances in optimal allocation methods for distributed renewable generation," IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3133–3150, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12815

M. Kumar et al., "Optimal Multi-Objective Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generation in Distribution System: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, vol. 15, no. 21, Oct. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15217850

A. M. Nassef et al., "Review of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms for Power Systems Problems," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 12, Jun. 2023, Art. no. 9434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129434

K. C. Phuoc, L. H. Pham, T. N. Ton, T. A. Le, and T. N. T. Huyen, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Emissions and Green Accounting Costs in Smart Distribution Networks with Distributed Generation," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 27781–27787, Oct. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.13578

T. N. Ton, H. H. Lai, L. V. Pham, and T. N. Hoang, "Optimization of Distributed Generation Planning to Maximize the Absorption Rate of Renewable Energy in Distribution Networks," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 23008–23013, Jun. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10921

H. Ma, Y. Zhang, S. Sun, T. Liu, and Y. Shan, "A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications," Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 15217–15270, Dec. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10526-z

W. Long et al., "A constrained multi-objective optimization algorithm using an efficient global diversity strategy," Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1455–1478, Apr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-022-00851-1

S. Dutta, R. Mallipeddi, and K. N. Das, "Hybrid selection based multi/many-objective evolutionary algorithm," Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, Apr. 2022, Art. no. 6861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10997-0

Y. Tian, Z. Shi, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, and X. Zhang, "Solving optimal power flow problems via a constrained many-objective co-evolutionary algorithm," Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 11, Oct. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1293193

C. A. Nallolla et al., "Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms for a Hybrid AC/DC Microgrid Using RES: A Comprehensive Review," Electronics, vol. 12, no. 4, Feb. 2023, Art. no. 1062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12041062

K. Li, R. Chen, G. Fu, and X. Yao, "Two-Archive Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Multiobjective Optimization," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 303–315, Apr. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2018.2855411

J. O. Agushaka, A. E. Ezugwu, J. O. Agushaka, and A. E. Ezugwu, "Initialisation Approaches for Population-Based Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Comprehensive Review," Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020896

J. Liang, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, X. Ban, K. Qiao, and K. Yu, "A dual-population constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with variable auxiliary population size," Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 5907–5922, Oct. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01042-2

R. Tanabe and K. Li, "Quality Indicators for Preference-Based Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Using a Reference Point: A Review and Analysis," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1575–1589, Sep. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2023.3319009

J. Liu and Y. Xu, "T-Friedman Test: A New Statistical Test for Multiple Comparison with an Adjustable Conservativeness Measure," International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, Apr. 2022, Art. no. 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-022-00083-8

Z. Ma, G. Wu, P. N. Suganthan, A. Song, and Q. Luo, "Performance assessment and exhaustive listing of 500+ nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms," Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 77, Mar. 2023, Art. no. 101248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2023.101248

S. A. Adegoke, Y. Sun, A. S. Adegoke, and D. Ojeniyi, "Optimal placement of distributed generation to minimize power loss and improve voltage stability," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 21, Nov. 2024, Art. no. e39298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39298

N. Saxena, M. Pandit, and L. Srivastava, "Multi-objective DG placement in radial distribution systems using the IbI logic algorithm," Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 12, Nov. 2024.

N. Saxena, M. Pandit, and L. Srivastava, "Multi-objective DG placement in radial distribution systems using the IbI logic algorithm," Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 12, pp. 89497–89509, Nov. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1453715

K. Shang, H. Ishibuchi, L. He, and L. M. Pang, "A Survey on the Hypervolume Indicator in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Oct. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2020.3013290

S. H. Dolatabadi, M. Ghorbanian, P. Siano, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, "An Enhanced IEEE 33 Bus Benchmark Test System for Distribution System Studies," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 2565–2572, Feb. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3038030

H. R. E. H. Bouchekara, Y. Latreche, K. Naidu, H. Mokhlis, W. M. Dahalan, and M. S. Javaid, "Comprehensive Review of Radial Distribution Test Systems for Power System Distribution Education and Research," Resource-Efficient Technologies, no. 3, pp. 1–12, Dec. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18799/24056537/2019/3/196

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
H. T. Vy and H. P. H. Anh, “Optimal Location and Sizing of Distributed Generation Units Using NSAGA-III with Heuristic Sampling and Restricted Mating”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 31294–31302, Feb. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 85
PDF Downloads: 41

Metrics Information