Zone-Aware Greenhouse Control and Multitask Crop Yield Prediction Using ConvLSTM and EMMYP-Net

Authors

  • K. P. Mayuri Department of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, BMS Institute of Technology and Management, Bengaluru, India, Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
  • Sheela Kathavate Department of Information Science and Engineering, BMS Institute of Technology and Management, Bengaluru, India, Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 31874-31879 | February 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.15707

Abstract

In the new age of greenhouse management, smart space adaptive systems are required to allow environmental control and crop analytics. This study presents an end-to-end deep learning architecture for spatiotemporal prediction and control in agriculture, which enables seamless integration between the different components of a decision loop. A ConvLSTM model predicts zone-specific microclimate variations, and a Dueling DQN agent selects the optimal actions for irrigation, ventilation, and fertilization according to energy demand, emission prediction, and soil moisture balance. The proposed EMMYP-Net (Enhanced Multimodal Multitask Yield Prediction Network) involves a CNN-BiLSTM-attention architecture that combines visual canopy data with multi-sensor sequences to co-classify growth stages and estimate yield. Experimental tests in a 1,200 m² four-zone greenhouse showed remarkable improvements, as ConvLSTM decreased RMSE by 45±2.3% compared to ARIMA and by 31±1.8% compared to LSTM. EMMYP-Net achieved an accuracy of 96.0% for classification, as well as an R² of 0.912±0.007 in predicting yields. This process-integrated approach enhanced resource sustainability by achieving savings of 19.3% in energy, 16.5% in water, and 15.2% in fertilizers relative to a conventional system. Combining predictive control and crop intelligence offers a scalable basis for sustainable data-driven greenhouse management. The key novelty of this work lies in the seamless integration of ConvLSTM-based spatiotemporal forecasting with the EMMYP-Net multimodal crop analytics within a unified reinforcement-learning-driven decision loop, enabling both predictive control and biological feedback in real time.

Keywords:

background zone-aware greenhouse control, ConvLSTM, dueling deep Q-Network, EMMYP-Net, CNN-BiLSTM-attention, spatio-temporal forecasting, multitask learning String Precision agriculture, reinforcement learning, intelligent greenhouse system

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Mallick, F. Airaldi, A. Dabiri, C. Sun, and B. De Schutter, "Reinforcement learning-based model predictive control for greenhouse climate control," Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 10, Mar. 2025, Art. no. 100751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100751

M. Platero-Horcajadas, S. Pardo-Pina, J. M. Cámara-Zapata, J. A. Brenes-Carranza, and F. J. Ferrández-Pastor, "Enhancing Greenhouse Efficiency: Integrating IoT and Reinforcement Learning for Optimized Climate Control," Sensors, vol. 24, no. 24, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 8109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248109

M. A. Tawfeek, N. Yanes, L. Jamel, G. Aldehim, and M. A. Mahmood, "Adaptive Deep Learning Model to Enhance Smart Greenhouse Agriculture," Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 2545–2564, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2023.042179

O. Bouketir, A. Saib, and A. Fenni, "A Fuzzy Logic-Based Greenhouse Smart System for Sustainable Tomato Production in Algeria," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 24110–24116, Aug. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10856

J. Wang, P. Wang, H. Tian, K. Tansey, J. Liu, and W. Quan, "A deep learning framework combining CNN and GRU for improving wheat yield estimates using time series remotely sensed multi-variables," Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 206, Mar. 2023, Art. no. 107705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107705

H. Tian, P. Wang, K. Tansey, J. Zhang, S. Zhang, and H. Li, "An LSTM neural network for improving wheat yield estimates by integrating remote sensing data and meteorological data in the Guanzhong Plain, PR China," Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 310, Nov. 2021, Art. no. 108629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108629

S. Khaki, L. Wang, and S. V. Archontoulis, "A CNN-RNN Framework for Crop Yield Prediction," Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 10, Jan. 2020, Art. no. 1750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01750

J. Sun, L. Di, Z. Sun, Y. Shen, and Z. Lai, "County-Level Soybean Yield Prediction Using Deep CNN-LSTM Model," Sensors, vol. 19, no. 20, Jan. 2019, Art. no. 4363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204363

Z. Chu and J. Yu, "An end-to-end model for rice yield prediction using deep learning fusion," Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 174, July 2020, Art. no. 105471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105471

V. Thanh Ha and P. H. Lam, "Yield and Quality Prediction of Crops using a Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Data Integration Framework," European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 12–19, Nov. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejece.2025.9.6.757

M. Von Bloh et al., "Machine learning for soybean yield forecasting in Brazil," Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 341, Oct. 2023, Art. no. 109670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109670

R. St Aime, E. Noh, W. C. Bridges, and S. Narayanan, "A Comparison of Drill and Broadcast Planting Methods for Biomass Production of Two Legume Cover Crops," Agronomy, vol. 12, no. 1, Dec. 2021, Art. no. 79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010079

P. Bari and L. Ragha, "Predicting wheat yield in agricultural industry using deep learning techniques: a review," Nigerian Journal of Technology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 716–737, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v43i4.11

J. Madhuri, M. Indiramma, and N. Nagarathna, "M-Bi-GRU-CNN: a hybrid deep learning model with optimized feature selection for enhanced crop yield prediction," Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 84, no. 32, pp. 39787–39811, Mar. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-025-20747-9

Pankaj et al., "Paddy yield prediction based on 2D images of rice panicles using regression techniques," The Visual Computer, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 4457–4471, June 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-023-03092-6

A. Oikonomidis, C. Catal, and A. Kassahun, "Hybrid Deep Learning-based Models for Crop Yield Prediction," Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 1, Dec. 2022, Art. no. 2031822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2022.2031823

M. Thanjaivadivel, C. Gobinath, J. Vellingiri, S. Kaliraj, and J. S. Femilda Josephin, "EnConv: enhanced CNN for leaf disease classification," Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, vol. 132, no. 1, Feb. 2025, Art. no. 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-01033-6

E. A. Devi, S. Gopi, U. Padmavathi, S. R. Arumugam, S. P. Premnath, and D. Muralitharan, "Plant Disease Classification using CNN-LSTM Techniques," in 2023 5th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), Tirunelveli, India, Jan. 2023, pp. 1225–1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT55814.2023.10061003

M. Shereesha, G. K. Sandhia, and R. Pitchai, "Dual RNN Architecture for Crop Disease Detection: Improved Patch‐Based CNN for Segmentation," Journal of Phytopathology, vol. 173, no. 3, May 2025, Art. no. e70079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.70079

V. Hiremani et al., "Federated learning for crop yield prediction: A comprehensive review of techniques and applications," MethodsX, vol. 14, June 2025, Art. no. 103408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103408

"Mayurikp/Greenhouse-Climate-monitoring-and-Control." Dec. 17, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://github.com/Mayurikp/Greenhouse-Climate-monitoring-and-Control.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
K. P. Mayuri and S. Kathavate, “Zone-Aware Greenhouse Control and Multitask Crop Yield Prediction Using ConvLSTM and EMMYP-Net”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 31874–31879, Feb. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 116
PDF Downloads: 108

Metrics Information