Finite Element Analysis Comparing the Formability of Large Hollow Protrusions in Tube Hydroforming

Authors

Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 32492-32497 | February 2026 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.15637

Abstract

The fabrication of large hollow protrusions for various types of metal joints using conventional stamping, welding, and casting methods often results in non-uniform deformation, material thinning, residual stresses, and thermal stresses. These issues compromise material continuity, reduce structural stiffness, and diminish overall strength. To address these challenges, the present study employs Tube Hydroforming (THF) technology to optimize the process of forming large hollow protrusions in T-shaped and X-shaped copper joints. The process was simulated using the Finite Element Method (FEM) in Abaqus/CAE 3DEXPERIENCE R2019, incorporating a plastic material model and nonlinear contact conditions to analyze and compare five critical parameters: the effective range of forming fluid pressure, the distribution of forming stress within the component, the components of plastic deformation, the wall thickness distribution, and the height of the large hollow protrusion. The results indicate that both joint types share the same effective forming fluid pressure range (Pi - max = 23 MPa + 30 MPa), and the achieved height of a single protrusion is equivalent (U1T(23 MPa) = 21.96 mm → U1T(25 MPa) = 22.82 mm → U1T(30 MPa) = 24.89 mm; U1X(23 MPa) = 21.31 mm → U1X(25MPa) = 22.22 mm → U1X(30MPa) = 24.82 mm). Furthermore, the wall thinning at the apex of the large hollow protrusion was found to remain within acceptable limits for both components (thinning ratio: emin-T = -24.17%, emin-X = -10.83%), while the transition zone of the X-joint exhibited more intense thinning; yet remained within safe margins. This research provides a reliable three-dimensional simulation framework for optimizing the THF process, reducing experimental costs, and improving product quality in the manufacture of large hollow protrusions for various types of hollow joints.

Keywords:

large hollow protrusion, T joint, X joint, THF, FEM

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Harjinder Singh, Fundamentals of hydroforming. The Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2003.

S. Chinchanikar, H. Mulik, P. Varude, S. Atole, and N. Mundada, "A review of emerging hydroforming technologies: design considerations, parametric studies, and recent innovations," Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, vol. 71, no. 1, Oct. 2024, Art. no. 205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00546-z

C. Bell, J. Corney, N. Zuelli, and D. Savings, "A state of the art review of hydroforming technology," International Journal of Material Forming, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 789–828, Sept. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-019-01507-1

N. V. Pham, Hydraulic Stamping Technology. Hanoi University of Science and Technology, 2006.

P. Ray and B. J. Mac Donald, "Experimental study and finite element analysis of simple X- and T-branch tube hydroforming processes," International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1498–1518, Oct. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.06.007

F. Abbassi, F. Ahmad, S. Gulzar, T. Belhadj, A. Karrech, and H. S. Choi, "Design of T-shaped tube hydroforming using finite element and artificial neural network modeling," Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1129–1138, Mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0214-4

X.-L. Cui, B. Teng, and S. Yuan, "Hydroforming process of complex T-shaped tubular parts of nickel-based superalloy," CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 32, pp. 476–490, Jan. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.02.001

L. Cheng, H. Guo, L. Sun, C. Yang, F. Sun, and J. Li, "Real-Time Simulation of Tube Hydroforming by Integrating Finite-Element Method and Machine Learning," Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, vol. 8, no. 4, Aug. 2024, Art. no. 175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8040175

H. Y. Li, X. S. Wang, S. J. Yuan, Q. B. Miao, and Z. R. Wang, "Typical stress states of tube hydroforming and their distribution on the yield ellipse," Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 345–349, Sept. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.085

B. G. Marlapalle and R. S. Hingole, "Predictions of formability parameters in tube hydroforming process," SN Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 6, May 2021, Art. no. 606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04533-4

Y.-M. Hwang, Y.-J. Wang, C.-C. Chen, and H.-S. R. Tsui, "Performance evaluation and loading path design in tube hydroforming of multi-convolution metal bellows," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 3241–3258, Nov. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-16611-7

S. Jirathearanat, "Advanced methods for finite element simulation for part and process design in tube hydroforming," M.S. Thesis, The Ohio State University ProQuest, USA, 2004.

N. D. Trung and V. D. Quang, "The Influence of the Protrusion Inclination Angle on the Formability of Hollow Joint in the Tube Hydroforming Process," Journal of Machine Engineering, pp. 83–96, Oct. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/203468

D. Berry, "R2019x Release: Established Products," Dassault Systèmes blog, Dec. 13, 2018. https://blog.3ds.com/brands/simulia/r2019x-release-established-products/.

R. Neugebauer, Ed., Hydro-Umformung. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49013-5

M. Koç, Hydroforming for Advanced Manufacturing. Elsevier, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439832998

S. Jirathearanat, C. Hartl, and T. Altan, "Hydroforming of Y-shapes—product and process design using FEA simulation and experiments," Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 124–129, Feb. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00852-5

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
V. D. Quang, “Finite Element Analysis Comparing the Formability of Large Hollow Protrusions in Tube Hydroforming”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 32492–32497, Feb. 2026.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 63
PDF Downloads: 33

Metrics Information