A Comparative Analysis of Time Synchronization Techniques for a Hybrid Multi-Rate Power Monitoring System

Authors

  • Ngo Phuong Le Institute of Science and Technology for Energy and Environment, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam | School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Hanoi University of Industry, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Binh Khanh Institute of Science and Technology for Energy and Environment, Vietnam
  • Luong Ngoc Giap Institute of Science and Technology for Energy and Environment, Vietnam
  • Truong Nguyen Tuong An Institute of Science and Technology for Energy and Environment, Vietnam
  • Bui Tien Trung Institute of Science and Technology for Energy and Environment, Vietnam
Volume: 15 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 29992-29998 | December 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.14702

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of time synchronization methodologies for a hybrid distributed power measurement system, specifically engineered to facilitate the creation of a high-resolution Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM) dataset for Vietnam. The system architecture employs a multi-rate approach, combining high-frequency (6.99 kHz) waveform sampling for transient event detection with low-frequency (~1 Hz) power monitoring for appliance state tracking. The primary technical challenge addressed is the achievement of microsecond-level time synchronization across distributed low-cost Internet of Things (IoT) nodes without resorting to specialized, high-cost timing hardware. Four distinct synchronization architectures are evaluated, from a baseline Internet-based Network Time Protocol (NTP) approach to a proposed software-generated Pulse Per Second (PPS) trigger mechanism. The performance of each method is rigorously assessed based on a synthesis of data from established literature and technical benchmarks, focusing on critical metrics including synchronization accuracy, temporal jitter, per-node deployment cost, and implementation complexity. The analysis validates that the proposed software-generated PPS trigger, orchestrated by an NVIDIA Jetson Nano edge computer, provides an optimal balance between these competing factors. It achieves microsecond-level synchronization accuracy (50-200 µs jitter) sufficient for high-fidelity NILM applications, while maintaining a low-cost hardware profile essential for scalable academic research.

Keywords:

NILM, time synchronization, PPS, IoT, Jetson

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Y. Liu, Y. Wang, and J. Ma, ''Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring in Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Review.'' arXiv, 2024.

S. Wali, M. H. U. Haq, M. Kazmi, and S. A. Qazi, ''An End-to-End Machine Learning based Unified Architecture for Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring,'' Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 7217–7222, June 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4142

P. A. Schirmer and I. Mporas, ''Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring: A Review,'' IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 769–784, Jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2022.3189598

D. P. B. Renaux et al., ''A Dataset for Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring: Design and Implementation,'' Energies, vol. 13, no. 20, Oct. 2020, Art. no. 5371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205371

F. Dinar, S. Paris, and É. Busvelle, ''Capturing High-Frequency Harmonic Signatures for NILM: Building a Dataset for Load Disaggregation,'' Sensors, vol. 25, no. 15, July 2025, Art. no. 4601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s25154601

J. Huchtkoetter and A. Reinhardt, ''On the Impact of Temporal Data Resolution on the Accuracy of Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring,'' in Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, Nov. 2020, pp. 270–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3408308.3427974

J. R. Herrero et al., ''Non Intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM): A State of the Art,'' in Trends in Cyber-Physical Multi-Agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection - 15th International Conference, PAAMS 2017, Porto, Portugal, 2018, pp. 125–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61578-3_12

C. Athanasiadis, D. Doukas, T. Papadopoulos, and A. Chrysopoulos, ''A Scalable Real-Time Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring System for the Estimation of Household Appliance Power Consumption,'' Energies, vol. 14, no. 3, Feb. 2021, Art. no. 767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030767

''Key Differences between NTP and Chrony,'' Infotechys.com, Apr. 11, 2025. https://infotechys.com/key-differences-between-ntp-and-chrony/.

''ADE7953 (Rev. C).'' Analog.com. Available: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ade7953.pdf.

''Measuring Interrupt Latency,'' NXP Products. Available: https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN12078.pdf.

''PZEM-004T-Datasheet-user-manual,'' Innovators Guru. Available: https://innovatorsguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/PZEM-004T-V3.0-Datasheet-User-Manual.pdf.

Espressif Documentation,' Espressif.' https://documentation.espressif.com/esp32_datasheet_en.pdf.

''System Time - ESP32 — ESP-IDF Programming Guide v5.5.1 documentation.'' Espressif. https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/stable/esp32/api-reference/system/system_time.html.

''Jitter vs Latency: Unraveling the Nuances in Network Performance,'' LiveAction. https://www.liveaction.com/resources/blog-post/jitter-vs-latency-unraveling-the-nuances-in-network-performance/.

D. L. Mills, "Measured performance of the Network Time Protocol in the Internet system," RFC Editor, RFC1128, Oct. 1989. https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc1128

G. K. Adam, ''Real-Time Performance and Response Latency Measurements of Linux Kernels on Single-Board Computers,'' Computers, vol. 10, no. 5, May 2021, Art. no. 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10050064

"GPS Pulse per Second Accuracy", May 24, 2025, https://static.fmad.io/blog-accuracy-of-pps-pulse-per-seccond.html.

D. L. Mills, "Internet Timekeeping Around the Globe," in Proceedings of the 29th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval Systems and Applications Meeting, Dec. 1997, pp. 365–372.

X. Niu, K. Yan, T. Zhang, Q. Zhang, H. Zhang, and J. Liu, ''Quality evaluation of the pulse per second (PPS) signals from commercial GNSS receivers,'' GPS Solutions, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 141–150, Jan. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0375-7

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
N. P. Le, N. B. Khanh, L. N. Giap, T. N. T. An, and B. T. Trung, “A Comparative Analysis of Time Synchronization Techniques for a Hybrid Multi-Rate Power Monitoring System”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 29992–29998, Dec. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 195
PDF Downloads: 355

Metrics Information