A Comparative Evaluation of Bias Correction Techniques for Improving GPM-IMERG Precipitation Data in the Welang Watershed, Indonesia

Authors

  • Ery Suhartanto Department of Water Resources Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia
  • Ussy Andawayanti Department of Water Resources Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Nurjati Hidayat Department of Water Resources Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia
  • Rahmah Dara Lufira Doctor Program of Water Resources Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia
  • Rizki Tri Utami Master Program of Water Resources Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia
Volume: 15 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 29935-29941 | December 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.13762

Abstract

Precise precipitation information underpins hydrological modeling, water resource planning, and hazard mitigation; yet, gauge coverage in many Indonesian catchments is sparse. The GPM-IMERG product provides 0.1°/30-min rainfall estimates, however, systematic biases limit its operational value. Five benchmark correction techniques were evaluated: Linear Scaling (LS), Linear Regression (LR), Genetic-Algorithm-based Correction Factor (GA-CF), Local Intensity Scaling (LOCI), and Power Transformation (PT) against daily observations from seven gauges in the Welang Watershed (2001–2020). LS delivered the most consistent improvement (NSE = 0.87, R = 0.92, RSR = 0.36), reducing the residual error by 30% relative to the next-best method. LR, GA-CF, and LOCI enhanced seasonal patterns (NSE ≈ 0.85), while PT provided complementary gains for moderate events but remained sub-optimal for extremes. The refined IMERG series met the accuracy thresholds proposed for reservoir operations, providing a readily deployable rainfall input for data-scarce, topographically complex tropical watersheds.

Keywords:

satellite precipitation, bias correction, GPM IMERG, hydrological modeling, Welang watershed

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. L. Tan and Z. Duan, "Assessment of GPM and TRMM Precipitation Products over Singapore," Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 7, July 2017, Art. no. 720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070720

Z. E. Asong, S. Razavi, H. S. Wheater, and J. S. Wong, "Evaluation of Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) over Southern Canada against Ground Precipitation Observations: A Preliminary Assessment," pp. 1033–1050, Apr. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0187.1

W. Sun et al., "Evaluation and Correction of GPM IMERG Precipitation Products over the Capital Circle in Northeast China at Multiple Spatiotemporal Scales," Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2018, no. 1, 2018, Art. no. 4714173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4714173

A. Lombardi et al., "On the combined use of rain gauges and GPM IMERG satellite rainfall products for hydrological modelling: impact assessment of the cellular-automata-based methodology in the Tanaro River basin in Italy," Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 3777–3797, Aug. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3777-2024

M. Jawad, B. Bhattacharya, A. Young, and S. J. van Andel, "Evaluation of Near Real-Time Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Precipitation Products for Hydrological Modelling and Flood Inundation Mapping of Sparsely Gauged Large Transboundary Basins—A Case Study of the Brahmaputra Basin," Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 10, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 1756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101756

X. Pan et al., "Evaluation and Applicability Analysis of GPM Satellite Precipitation over Mainland China," Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 11, Jan. 2023, Art. no. 2866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112866

D. R. Tama, Limantara, Lily M., E. Suhartanto, and Y. P. Devia, "The important of Global Precipitation Measurement in ungauged catchment," ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, pp. 2043–2050, Nov. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59018/0923250

H. Kuswanto, D. Setiawan, and A. Sopaheluwakan, "Clustering of Precipitation Pattern in Indonesia Using TRMM Satellite Data," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 4484–4489, Aug. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2950

Abd. R. As-syakur, T. Tanaka, T. Osawa, and M. S. Mahendra, "Indonesian rainfall variability observation using TRMM multi-satellite data," International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 7723–7738, Nov. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.826837

S. Suroso, P. B. Santoso, S. Birkinshaw, C. Kilsby, A. Bardossy, and E. Aldrian, "Assessment of TRMM rainfall data for flood modelling in three contrasting catchments in Java, Indonesia," Journal of Hydroinformatics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 797–814, Apr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2023.132

E. Hidayah, W. Y. Widiarti, P. P. Putra, A. A. Dewantie, M. Z. Alhamda, and H. Prastika, "Evaluation of Hydrologic Modelling Using Satellite Product, and MMR Rainfall in East Java, Indonesia," Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. Vol. 22, no. nr 11, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/142843

S. Purnama, "Evaluation of Groundwater and Springs Potency in East Java Province," E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 468, 2023, Art. no. 08003, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346808003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346808003

H. Mulyanti, I. Istadi, and R. Gernowo, "Historical, Recent, and Future Threat of Drought on Agriculture in East Java, Indonesia: A Review," E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 448, 2023, Art. no. 03016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344803016

N. Rahmawati, K. Rahayu, and S. T. Yuliasari, "Performance of daily satellite-based rainfall in groundwater basin of Merapi Aquifer System, Yogyakarta," Theoretical and Applied Climatology, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 173–190, Oct. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03731-9

A. W. Worako, A. T. Haile, T. Rientjes, and T. A. Woldesenbet, "Error propagation of climate model rainfall to streamflow simulation in the Gidabo sub-basin, Ethiopian Rift Valley Lakes Basin," Hydrological Sciences Journal, pp. 1185–1198, June 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2072220

D. Y. Faidah, H. Kuswanto, and S. Sutikno, "Improving the Accuracy of Rainfall Prediction Using Bias-Corrected NMME Outputs: A Case Study of Surabaya City, Indonesia," The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2022, no. 1, 2022, Art. no. 9779829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9779829

Z. Iqbal, S. Shahid, K. Ahmed, X. Wang, T. Ismail, and H. F. Gabriel, "Bias correction method of high-resolution satellite-based precipitation product for Peninsular Malaysia," Theoretical and Applied Climatology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 1429–1446, May 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04007-6

R. Nosratpour and M. Rahimzadegan, "Clustering and assessment of precipitation climates using satellite precipitation products and improved machine learning precipitation models," International Journal of Climatology, vol. 43, no. 16, pp. 7819–7850, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8294

G. H. Fang, J. Yang, Y. N. Chen, and C. Zammit, "Comparing bias correction methods in downscaling meteorological variables for a hydrologic impact study in an arid area in China," Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2547–2559, June 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2547-2015

E. Soriano, L. Mediero, and C. Garijo, "Selection of Bias Correction Methods to Assess the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Curves," Water, vol. 11, no. 11, Nov. 2019, Art. no. 2266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112266

D. S. Londhe, Y. B. Katpatal, and N. D. Bokde, "Performance Assessment of Bias Correction Methods for Precipitation and Temperature from CMIP5 Model Simulation," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 16, Jan. 2023, Art. no. 9142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169142

L. Tu and L. Duan, "Spatial downscaling analysis of GPM IMERG precipitation dataset based on multiscale geographically weighted regression model: a case study of the Inner Mongolia Reach of the Yellow River basin," Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 12, Apr. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1389587

H. Yang et al., "An Efficient Method for Wavefront Aberration Correction Based on the RUN Optimizer," Photonics, vol. 11, no. 1, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11010029

N. Turini et al., "Assessment of Satellite-Based Rainfall Products Using a X-Band Rain Radar Network in the Complex Terrain of the Ecuadorian Andes," Atmosphere, vol. 12, no. 12, Dec. 2021, Art. no. 1678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12121678

W. Gumindoga, T. H. M. Rientjes, A. T. Haile, H. Makurira, and P. Reggiani, "Performance of bias-correction schemes for CMORPH rainfall estimates in the Zambezi River basin," Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2915–2938, July 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2915-2019

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
E. Suhartanto, U. Andawayanti, M. N. Hidayat, R. D. Lufira, and R. T. Utami, “A Comparative Evaluation of Bias Correction Techniques for Improving GPM-IMERG Precipitation Data in the Welang Watershed, Indonesia”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 29935–29941, Dec. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 277
PDF Downloads: 236

Metrics Information