A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for the Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Design Using NSGA-II: Balancing Efficiency and Structural Compactness

Authors

  • Van Thanh Dinh East Asia University of Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Ngoc Pi Vu Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
  • Duc Binh Vu Viet Tri University of Industry, Viet Tri, Vietnam
  • Duong Vu School of Engineering and Technology, Duy Tan University, Nang City, Vietnam
Volume: 15 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 29319-29324 | December 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.13333

Abstract

The design of two-stage helical gearboxes inherently involves trade-offs between the structural compactness and transmission efficiency. Traditional design methods often fail to capture these competing objectives simultaneously. This study presents a comprehensive multi-objective optimization approach using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to identify the optimal trade-offs between minimizing the cross-sectional area and maximizing the efficiency of a two-stage helical gearbox. Drawing from the strengths of evolutionary algorithms and integrating insights from prior literature on hybrid and decision-making-based optimization methods, the proposed model formulates the gearbox design problem with realistic constraints and evaluates the Pareto front of optimal solutions. The results demonstrate that NSGA-II provides a well-distributed set of non-dominated solutions, offering engineers greater flexibility in balancing performance and structural requirements. The comparative analysis with existing approaches highlights the effectiveness of the proposed method in simultaneously achieving compactness and energy efficiency in gearbox systems.

Keywords:

NSGA-II, multi-objective optimization, gearbox design, helical gear, gear ratio, efficiency, cross-sectional area, trade-off analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. A. Coello Coello, G. B. Lamont, and D. A. Van Veldhuizen, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems, 2nd Ed. New York City, NY, USA: Springer, 2007.

K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, "A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, Apr. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

T. H. Chong, "A Design Method of Gear Trains Using a Genetic Algorithm," International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 62–70, Jun. 2000.

M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and K. Shankar, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Spur Gearbox with Inclusion of Tribological Aspects," Journal of Friction and Wear, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 430–436, Nov. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068366617060101

M. Mendez, D. A. Rossit, B. Gonzalez, and M. Frutos, "Proposal and Comparative Study of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimum Design of a Gear System," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 3482–3497, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962906

K. Daoudi, E. M. Boudi, and M. Abdellah, "Genetic Approach for Multiobjective Optimization of Epicyclical Gear Train," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2019, no. 1, Jan. 2019, Art. no. 9324903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9324903

M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and S. Krishnapillai, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Two Stage Spur Gearbox Using NSGA-II," in International Conference on Advances in Design, Materials, Manufacturing and Surface Engineering for Mobility, Chennai, India, Jul. 2017, pp. 2017-28–1939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-28-1939

E. S. Maputi and R. Arora, "Multi-objective Optimization of a 2-stage Spur Gearbox Using NSGA-II and Decision-making Methods," Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 42, no. 9, Sep. 2020, Art. no. 477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02557-2

L. Qi, J. Zhou, and H. Xu, "Multi-objective Optimization of Gearbox Based on Panel Acoustic Participation and Response Surface Methodology," Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1108–1130, Sep. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484221091075

E. B. Younes, C. Changenet, J. Bruyère, E. Rigaud, and J. Perret-Liaudet, "Multi-objective Optimization of Gear Unit Design to Improve Efficiency and Transmission Error," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 167, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 104499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104499

J. J. Eckert, S. F. Da Silva, F. M. Santiciolli, Á. C. De Carvalho, and F. G. Dedini, "Multi-speed Gearbox Design and Shifting Control Optimization to Minimize Fuel Consumption, Exhaust Emissions and Drivetrain Mechanical Losses," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 169, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 104644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104644

M. Gobbi, G. Mastinu, and M. Caudano, "Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimisation of a Gearbox Synchroniser and Selector Mechanism," in Design Engineering, Volumes 1 and 2, Washington, DC, USA, Jan. 2003, pp. 113–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2003-43005

V.-T. Dinh et al., "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using MARCOS Method," Designs, vol. 8, no. 3, Jun. 2024, Art. no. 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/designs8030053

M. Rosić, B. Rosić, and M. Sedak, "Multi-Objective Hybrid Sailfish Optimization Algorithm for Planetary Gearbox and Mechanical Engineering Design Optimization Problems," Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 2111–2145, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2025.059319

J. Alam and S. Panda, "A Comprehensive Study on Multi-objective Design Optimization of Spur Gear," Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 5272–5298, Sep. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2021.1996246

D. Miler, D. Žeželj, A. Lončar, and K. Vučković, "Multi-objective Spur Gear Pair Optimization Focused on Volume and Efficiency," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 125, pp. 185–195, Jul. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.03.012

O. D. Mohammed, A. D. S. Bhat, and P. Falk, "Robust Multi-objective Optimization of Gear Microgeometry Design," Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 119, Sep. 2022, Art. no. 102593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102593

Q. Yao, "Multi-objective Optimization Design of Spur Gear Based on NSGA-II and Decision Making," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, Mar. 2019, Art. no. 1687814018824936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018824936

T. Q. Hung, V. D. Binh, D. V. Thanh, L. A. Tung, and N. K. Tuan, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Two Gear Sets in First Stage to Reduce Volume and Enhance Efficiency using the EAMR Technique," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19288–19294, Feb. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.9224

Z. Xiang, X. Zhu, M. Jiang, and L. Quan, "Multi-Objective-Layered Optimization of a Magnetic Planetary Gear for Hybrid Powertrain," IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 934–944, Feb. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3113591

M. Nasr, K. Maalawi, and K. Yihia, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Planetary Gear Train Using Genetic Algorithm," Journal of International Society for Science and Engineering, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 0–0, Sep. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jisse.2022.144284.1059

J.-H. Kim, B.-S. Kim, D. Im, J.-H. Park, D.-J. Moon, and Y.-J. Park, "Optimization of High-speed Angular Contact Ball Bearing for Aircraft Gearbox Utilizing an Evolutionary Multi-objective Algorithm, NSGA-III," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 9, Sep. 2024, Art. no. 16878132241272197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132241272197

T. Chat and U. L. Van, Design and Calculation of Mechanical Transmissions Systems, vol. 1. Hanoi, Vietnam: Educational Republishing House, 2007.

X.-H. Le and N.-P. Vu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 13, Jun. 2023, Art. no. 7601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137601

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
V. T. Dinh, N. P. Vu, D. B. Vu, and D. Vu, “A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for the Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Design Using NSGA-II: Balancing Efficiency and Structural Compactness”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 29319–29324, Dec. 2025.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 302
PDF Downloads: 199

Metrics Information