Rail-Route Planning Using a Geographical Information System (GIS)

Authors

  • S. Panchal Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India
  • A. Debbarma Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India
Volume: 7 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 2010-2013 | October 2017 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.1329

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse the potential of geographical information system (GIS) in decision making in rail route planning process. The various parameters affecting the alignment of rail route are considered in this study and a feasibility map is prepared considering the cumulative effect of these factors. The factors considered in this study are road network, slope, topographical characteristics and drainage characteristics of study area. Each parameter is given weights according to analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in GIS environment. The layers of parameters affecting the feasibility of route are overlaid in GIS environment to find a feasibility map. Feasibility map is divided into five categories i.e. very low, low, moderate, high and extremely feasible on the basis of feasibility index.

Keywords:

route, planning, AHP, GIS, high speed rail, transport

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Della Acqua, “Using Fuzzy Inference Systems to Optimize Highway Alignments”, International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 44-59, 2008

R. Mateus, J. A. Ferreira, J. Carreira, “Multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway station”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 187, pp. 1-18, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.006

J. Barzilai, “Deriving Weights from Pair wise Comparison Matrices”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 48, No. 12, pp. 1226-1232, 1997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jors.2600474

I. Ambrasaite, M. B. Barfod, K. B. Sallin, “MCDA and Risk Analysis in Transport Infrastructure Appraisals: The Rail Baltica Case”, Proscenia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 20, pp. 944–953, 2011

T. L. Saaty, “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operation Research,Vol. 48, No.1, pp. 9-26, 1990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I

T. Kara, M.Cengiz Savas, “Design and Simulation of Decentralized Railway Traffic Control System”, Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 945-951, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.631

A. Predo, M. Ronkko, S. Pickl, M. Kolehmainen, “GIS-Based Route Planning for HAZMAT Transportation”, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41151-9_34

Y. H. Wu, H. Miller, M. C. Hung, “A GIS-based decision support system for analysis of route choice in congested urban road networks”, Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 3-24, 2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011466

R. Huang, “A schedule-based pathfinding algorithm for transit networks using pattern first search”, GeoInformatica, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 269-285, 2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-0011-y

C. Macharis, A. De Witte, L. Turcksin, “The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) application in the Flemish long-term decision making process on mobility and logistics”, Transport Policy, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 303-311, 2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.02.004

I. Ambrasaite, M. B. Barfod, K. B. Sallin, “MCDA and Risk Analysis in Transport Infrastructure Appraisals: The Rail Baltica Case”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 20, pp. 944–953, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.103

X. Chen, M. Zhang, “High-Speed Rail Project Development processes in the United States and China”, 2010,Transportation Research Record, No. 2159, pp. 9-17, 2010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2159-02

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Panchal, S. and Debbarma, A. 2017. Rail-Route Planning Using a Geographical Information System (GIS). Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 7, 5 (Oct. 2017), 2010–2013. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.1329.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 1404
PDF Downloads: 906

Metrics Information