This is a preview and has not been published. View submission

Hybrid GRA-EDAS-Based Evaluation of Electrode Materials for Automotive Spot Welding Applications

Authors

  • Tanatat Monmongkol Department of Logistics and Process Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Chachoengsao, Thailand
  • Noppadol Sriputtha Department of Robotics and Lean Automation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Nattapat Kanchanaruangrong Department of Industrial Management Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Chachoengsao, Thailand
  • Pariwat Nasawat Department of Logistics and Process Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Chachoengsao, Thailand
Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 25088-25094 | August 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11871

Abstract

The performance of Resistance Spot Welding (RSW) in the automotive industry is heavily influenced by the selection of appropriate electrode materials, which must balance multiple and often conflicting criteria such as conductivity, hardness, cost, and wear resistance. This study presents a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method, integrating Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) to systematically evaluate and rank eight alternative electrode materials. EDAS evaluates alternatives against average performance benchmarks, while GRA determines the weights of the objective criteria. The study considers seven key criteria: electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, Rockwell hardness, yield strength, density, cost, and wear resistance. The hybrid GRA-EDAS approach involves an eight-step procedure, with results indicating that C18150 consistently outperformed other materials at every evaluation stage, followed by C17510 and C16200. The robustness and reliability of the proposed method were validated by comparison with established techniques such as WASPAS and MAUT, showing strong agreement using Spearman's correlation ( =0.929 with WASPAS and =0.833 with MAUT). The findings highlight the effectiveness and consistency of the hybrid GRA-EDAS framework in delivering comprehensive and reliable evaluations for material selection decisions in industrial settings.

Keywords:

hybrid MCDM, GRA-EDAS, electrode material selection

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. J. Zhang, I. Cross, P. Feldman, S. Rama, S. Norman, and M. Del Duca, "Electrode life of aluminium resistance spot welding in automotive applications: a survey," Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 22–40, Jan. 2017.

B. Bachchhav, A. Kumbhare, C. Hoonur, S. Kulkarni, and J. Kalankar, "Grading of Spot Welding Electrode Material Properties Using AHP," Journal of Modern Mechanical Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, pp. 59–65, Jun. 2020.

A. Jahan, M. Y. Ismail, S. M. Sapuan, and F. Mustapha, "Material screening and choosing methods – A review," Materials & Design, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 696–705, Feb. 2010.

T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, vol. 186. Springer, 1981.

S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, Jul. 2004.

D. Julong, "Introduction to grey system theory," The Journal of Grey System, vol. 1, no. 1, 1989.

M. K. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, and Z. Turskis, "Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS)," Informatica, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 435–451, Jan. 2015.

E. K. Zavadskas, K. Govindan, J. Antucheviciene, and Z. Turskis, "Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 857–887, Jan. 2016.

W. Niu, Y. Rong, L. Yu, and L. Huang, "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 17, Aug. 2022, Art. no. 3116.

R. Mallick, S. Pramanik, and B. Giri, "Neutrosophic MAGDM based on critic-EDAS strategy using geometric aggregation operator," Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 683–698, 2023.

A. Menekse, A. V. Ertemel, H. Camgoz Akdag, and A. Gorener, "Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS," PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 3, Mar. 2023, Art. no. e0282676.

C. Z. Radulescu and M. Radulescu, "A Hybrid Group Multi-Criteria Approach Based on SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR, and COPRAS Methods for Complex IoT Selection Problems," Electronics, vol. 13, no. 4, Feb. 2024, Art. no. 789.

L. D. Bao, V. D. Binh, D. V. Thanh, N. T. Tu, and L. A. Tung, "Application of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for the Determination of the Best Dressing Factors for Surface Grinding Hardox 500," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20222–20228, Feb. 2025.

C. Kahraman, M. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, S. Cevik Onar, M. Yazdani, and B. Oztaysi, "Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: An application to solid waste disposal site selection," Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2017.

A. R. Mishra, A. Mardani, P. Rani, and E. K. Zavadskas, "A novel EDAS approach on intuitionistic fuzzy set for assessment of health-care waste disposal technology using new parametric divergence measures," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 272, Nov. 2020, Art. no. 122807.

X. Peng and C. Liu, "Algorithms for neutrosophic soft decision making based on EDAS, new similarity measure and level soft set," Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 955–968, Jan. 2017.

Z. Li, G. Wei, R. Wang, J. Wu, C. Wei, and Y. Wei, "EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment," Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 86–102, Nov. 2019.

A. P. Darko and D. Liang, "Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making with modified EDAS method," Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 87, Jan. 2020, Art. no. 103259.

M. K. Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and J. Antucheviciene, "A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 112, pp. 156–174, Oct. 2017.

Y. Akhtar, M. Ali, F. A. Almaliki, and R. A. Almarzouki, "A novel IoT-based approach using fractional fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators application in revolutionizing healthcare selection," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2025, Art. no. 2712.

A. T. Nguyen, D. B. Vu, V. T. Nguyen, X. H. Le, and M. C. Nguyen, "Determination of Best Input Parameters for Internal Grinding SKD11 Tool Steel using MCDM," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20190–20196, Feb. 2025.

N. T. Mai, "Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: Combination of Preference Selection Index Method with Faire Un Choix Adèquat, Root Assessment Method, and Proximity Indexed Value," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19086–19090, Feb. 2025.

A. Sriburum, N. Wichapa, and W. Khanthirat, "A Novel TOPSIS Linear Programming Model Based on the Taguchi Method for Solving the Multi-Response Optimization Problems: A Case Study of a Fish Scale Scraping Machine," Engineered Science, vol. Volume 23, May 2023, Art. no. 882.

S. Chakraborty and E. K. Zavadskas, "Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making," Informatica, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Jan. 2014.

M. Akram, N. Ramzan, and M. Deveci, "Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS method for multiple-attribute group decision analysis," Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 119, Mar. 2023, Art. no. 105777.

P. Kailomsom, P. Nasawat, W. Khunthirat, and W. Phuangpornpitak, "A Hybrid Method based on BWM and TOPSIS-LP Model to Assess Computer Numerical Control Machines," Engineering Access, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 108–118, 2025.

S. Phokha, C. Sasen, P. Nasawat, and N. Kanchanaruangrong, "Optimization of Rubber Sheet Rolling Machine Parameters using a Taguchi-based TOPSIS Linear Programming Model," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20508–20516, Feb. 2025.

B. Bachchhav and S. Chaitanya, "Selection of Spot Welding Electrode Material by Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation, VIKOR and WASPAS Methods," SAMRIDDHI : A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 15, no. 01, pp. 60–66, Jan. 2023.

S. Gonwirat, A. Choompol, and N. Wichapa, "A combined deep learning model based on the ideal distance weighting method for fake news detection," International Journal of Data and Network Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 347–354, 2022.

N. Wichapa and P. Khokhajaikiat, "A novel holistic approach for solving the multi-criteria transshipment problem for infectious waste management," Decision Science Letters, pp. 441–454, 2019.

N. Wichapa and S. Sodsoon, "A Relative Closeness Coefficient Model Based on the Distance of Virtual DMUs Cross- Efficiency Method for Ranking Thai Economic Development," Engineering Letters, vol. 31, no. 1, 2023.

N. Wichapa, P. Nasawat, N. Kanchanaruangrong, and A. Choompol, "A combined DEAV-BWM approach for effective evaluation and ranking of biomass materials in charcoal briquette production," MethodsX, vol. 13, Dec. 2024, Art. no. 103075.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Monmongkol, T., Sriputtha, N., Kanchanaruangrong, N. and Nasawat, P. 2025. Hybrid GRA-EDAS-Based Evaluation of Electrode Materials for Automotive Spot Welding Applications. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 15, 4 (Aug. 2025), 25088–25094. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11871.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 65
PDF Downloads: 22

Metrics Information