Optimizing Two-Stage Gear Design using NSGA-II with MATLAB: Multi-Objective Approach on Mass and Efficiency Trade-Off

Authors

  • Ngoc Pi Vu Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen City 251750, Vietnam
  • Duc Binh Vu Viet Tri University of Industry, Viet Tri City 35100, Vietnam
  • Van Thanh Dinh East Asia University of Technology, Hanoi City 12000, Vietnam
  • Duong Vu School of Engineering and Technology, Duy Tan University, Da Nang City 50000, Vietnam
  • Trieu Quy Huy University of Economics and Technology for Industries, Ha Noi 11622, Vietnam
Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 23586-23591 | June 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11162

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive methodology for the multi-objective optimization of a two-stage spur gear reducer, aiming to minimize mass while maximizing efficiency. A physically grounded mathematical model is constructed to express gearbox mass and efficiency as functions of critical design parameters, including the gear ratio of the first stage (u1) and the face width coefficients of both stages (Xba1, Xba2). The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is implemented in MATLAB to solve the optimization problem across a range of total transmission ratios (uh ∈ [5, 35]). For each , the algorithm produces a Pareto front, which reflects the trade-offs between objectives. Results reveal consistent design trends, with increasing overall transmission ratio leading to reduced mass and improved efficiency. The proposed methodology provides a decision-support tool for gearbox engineers and paves the way for intelligent design frameworks integrating simulation and optimization.

Keywords:

multi-objective optimization, NSGA-II, MATLAB, gearbox design, efficiency, mass minimization, spur gear, transmission ratio

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Prayoonrat and D. Walton, "Practical approach to optimum gear train design," Computer-Aided Design, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 83–92, Mar. 1988.

H. Zarefar and S. N. Muthukrishnan, "Computer-aided optimal design via modified adaptive random-search algorithm," Computer-Aided Design, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 240–248, Apr. 1993.

H. Wang and H.-P. Wang, "Optimal engineering design of spur gear sets," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1071–1080, Oct. 1994.

M. M. A. Kader, S. P. Nigam, and G. K. Grover, "A study on mode of failures in spur gears under optimized conditions," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 839–850, Aug. 1998.

C. Gologlu and M. Zeyveli, "A genetic approach to automate preliminary design of gear drives," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1043–1051, Oct. 2009.

V. Savsani, R. V. Rao, and D. P. Vakharia, "Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 531–541, Mar. 2010.

M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and K. Shankar, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Spur Gearbox with Inclusion of Tribological Aspects," Journal of Friction and Wear, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 430–436, Nov. 2017.

X.-H. Le and N.-P. Vu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 13, Jul. 2023, Art. no. 7601.

V.-T. Dinh et al., "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method," Processes, vol. 12, no. 6, Jun. 2024, Art. no. 1160.

C. A. Coello Coello, G. B. Lamont, and D. A. Van Veldhuizen, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, 2nd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Springer US, 2007.

K. Miettinen, Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, 1st. ed. Boston, MA, USA: Springer US, 1998.

A. Konak, D. W. Coit, and A. E. Smith, "Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 992–1007, Sep. 2006.

K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, "A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, Apr. 2002.

R. C. Sanghvi, A. S. Vashi, H. P. Patolia, and R. G. Jivani, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Two-Stage Helical Gear Train Using NSGA-II," Journal of Optimization, vol. 2014, no. 1, Nov. 2014, Art. no. 670297.

E. S. Maputi and R. Arora, "Multi-objective optimization of a 2-stage spur gearbox using NSGA-II and decision-making methods," Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 42, no. 9, Aug. 2020, Art. no. 477.

E. B. Younes, C. Changenet, J. Bruyère, E. Rigaud, and J. Perret-Liaudet, "Multi-objective optimization of gear unit design to improve efficiency and transmission error," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 167, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 104499.

Q. Yao, "Multi-objective optimization design of spur gear based on NSGA-II and decision making," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, Mar. 2019, Art. no. 1687814018824936.

M. I. Hlal, V. K. Ramachandaramurthya, S. Padmanaban, H. R. Kaboli, A. Pouryekta, and T. A. R. bin T. Abdullah, "NSGA-II and MOPSO based optimization for sizing of hybrid PV/wind/battery energy storage system," International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 463–478, Mar. 2019.

M. El-Nemr, M. Afifi, H. Rezk, and M. Ibrahim, "Finite Element Based Overall Optimization of Switched Reluctance Motor Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II)," Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 5, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 576.

X. Zhuang et al., "Multi-objective optimization of reservoir development strategy with hybrid artificial intelligence method," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 241, May 2024, Art. no. 122707.

B. Yan, M. Gudala, and S. Sun, "Robust optimization of geothermal recovery based on a generalized thermal decline model and deep learning," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 286, Jun. 2023, Art. no. 117033.

S. K. Yadav, S. Ghosh, and A. Sivanandam, "An intelligent hybrid optimization approach to improve the end milling performance of Incoloy 925 based on ANN-NSGA-II-ETOPSIS," International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 4673–4695, Sep. 2024.

M. Willecke and J. Brimmers, "Investigation of the Potential of Using Surrogate Models in the Gear Design Process," Gear Technology, pp. 68–74, Dec. 2021.

R. T. Marler and J. S. Arora, "Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering," Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 369–395, Apr. 2004.

H.-D. Tran, V.-T. Dinh, D.-B. Vu, D. Vu, A.-T. Luu, and N. P. Vu, "Application of the TOPSIS Method for Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 15454–15463, Aug. 2024.

Y. Berrouche, "A Non-Parametric Empirical Method for Nonlinear and Non-Stationary Signal Analysis," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8058–8062, Feb. 2022.

V.-T. Dinh, H.-D. Tran, D.-B. Vu, D. Vu, N.-P. Vu, and A.-T. Luu, "Application of a Multi-Criterion Decision-Making Method for Solving the Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox," Machines, vol. 12, no. 6, Jun. 2024, Art. no. 365.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Vu, N.P., Vu, D.B., Dinh, V.T., Vu, D. and Huy, T.Q. 2025. Optimizing Two-Stage Gear Design using NSGA-II with MATLAB: Multi-Objective Approach on Mass and Efficiency Trade-Off. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 15, 3 (Jun. 2025), 23586–23591. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11162.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 52
PDF Downloads: 51

Metrics Information