Impact of Seismic Design on Embodied Carbon in Steel Buildings: A Structural Element-based Assessment

Authors

  • Militia Keintjem Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
  • Riza Suwondo Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
  • Made Suangga Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 23224-23228 | June 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10768

Abstract

The building and construction sector is a major contributor to global carbon emissions, with Embodied Carbon (EC) from material production, transportation, and construction gaining increasing attention. Although seismic design enhances structural safety, it also leads to a higher material consumption, thereby increasing the EC footprint of the buildings. This study examines the impact of seismic design on EC in steel buildings, focusing on columns, beams, and floors. A two-story steel-framed building was analyzed under low, moderate, and high seismic intensities. The EC assessment followed BS EN 15978, considering cradle-to-gate emissions (stages A1–A3) using industry-standard Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE) database values. Structural modeling was conducted using ETABS to determine the material demands. The results showed that the total EC increased by approximately 51% from non-seismic to high seismic conditions. Columns and beams exhibited the highest proportional increase owing to the larger cross-sectional sizes required for seismic stability, while concrete slabs contributed the most absolute emissions. Steel components, however, exhibited the greatest relative rise in carbon intensity. To reduce the EC in seismic design, structural optimization methods, high-strength steel utilization, and material reuse strategies should be explored. This study provides a scientific foundation for integrating sustainability into seismic regulations, thus contributing to low-carbon structural solutions for earthquake-prone regions.

Keywords:

embodied carbon, seismic design, sustainable construction, steel structure

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero‐Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme, 2022.

M. Keintjem, R. Suwondo, L. Cunningham, and H. Razak, "Embodied Carbon in Concrete: Insights from Indonesia and Comparative Analysis with UK and USA," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 17737–17742, Dec. 2024.

Bringing embodied carbon upfront: Coordinated action for the building and construction sector to tackle embodied carbon. London, UK: World Green Building Council, 2019.

D. Khan, E. A. Khan, M. S. Tara, S. Shujaa, and S. Gardezi, "Embodied Carbon Footprint Assessment of a Conventional Commercial Building Using BIM," in Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology, S. M. Ahmed, P. Hampton, S. Azhar, and A. D. Saul, Eds. Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 247–250.

M. Hellmeister, Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Embodied Carbon and Operational Energy of Different Building Systems, University of Maine, USA, 2022.

S. Seo, A. Passer, J. Zelezna, and H. Birgisdottir, Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO2eq for Building Construction (Annex 57). Tokyo, Japan: International Energy Agency, Sep. 2016.

N. C. Onat, M. Kucukvar, and O. Tatari, "Scope-based carbon footprint analysis of U.S. residential and commercial buildings: An input–output hybrid life cycle assessment approach," Building and Environment, vol. 72, pp. 53–62, Feb. 2014.

S. Su, H. Zhang, J. Zuo, X. Li, and J. Yuan, "Assessment models and dynamic variables for dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings: a review," Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 28, no. 21, pp. 26199–26214, Jun. 2021.

H. Horiuchi and N. Wang, "Structural Design and Embodied Carbon: Considerations over a Building’s Service Life," Structure, Mar. 2019.

Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. Reston: ASCE, 2017.

ANSI/AISC 360-16: Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI, 2016.

ANSI/AISC 342-22: Seismic Provisions for Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI, Aug. 2016.

ACI CODE-318-19(22): Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (Reapproved 2022). ACI, 2022.

"ETABS (2023)." Computers and Structures, Inc, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2023.

Sustainability of construction works: assessment of environmental performance of buildings : calculation method, London, UK: BSI, 2012.

O. P. Gibbons and J. J. Orr, How to calculate embodied carbon, 2nd ed. London, UK: ICE, 2022.

"Embodied Carbon Primer," leti. https://www.leti.uk/ecp.

Circular Ecology: The Inventory of Carbon and Energy (The ICE Database). London, UK: ICE, 2020.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Keintjem, M., Suwondo, R. and Suangga, M. 2025. Impact of Seismic Design on Embodied Carbon in Steel Buildings: A Structural Element-based Assessment. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 15, 3 (Jun. 2025), 23224–23228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10768.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 20
PDF Downloads: 23

Metrics Information