Mechanical Behavior of Tailings Sands: A Numerical Analysis using the UBCSAND Constitutive Model

Authors

  • Reynaldo Melquiades Reyes Roque Academic Professional School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, National University of Santiago Antunez Mayolo, Huaraz, 02002, Ancash, Peru
  • Gianina Mariela Chinchay Poma Academic Professional School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, National University of Santiago Antunez Mayolo, Huaraz, 02002, Ancash, Peru
  • Hirbin Felix Cespedes Reynaga Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, 15088, Lima, Peru
  • Ronald Madera Teran Professional School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Pure Sciences, Universidad Andina Nestor Caceres Velasquez, 211101, Juliaca, Peru
  • Santiago Alberto Casas Luna School of Health Engineering, Faculty of Ecology, Universidad Nacional de San Martin, 22200, Tarapoto, Peru
Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 23095-23104 | June 2025 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10380

Abstract

This study aimed to demonstrate the practical advantages of the UBCSAND constitutive model in simulating the mechanical behavior of tailings sands through numerical analysis. For this purpose, a mixed approach of non-experimental design, applied type, and comparative scope was chosen. The population consisted of 20 monotonic triaxial tests for tailings sands and the purposive sample consisted of 3 tests performed with confining stresses of 5, 10, and 15 kg/cm2 under undrained conditions. Simulations were performed using the TNO DIANA finite element software, which incorporates the UBCSAND model. The validation of the model's implementation was achieved by comparing its predictions with both the experimental results and simulations conducted using the PLAXIS program. The results indicated that the numerical responses of stress-strain, volumetric change-strain, and stress path, showed a strong compatibility with the experimental data at a confining stress of 5 kg/m2, while for higher values (10 and 15 kg/m2) there was still a good agreement with some moderate observations. Consequently, the study proposes that the UBCSAND constitutive model is an efficient alternative approach to predict with high accuracy the mechanical behavior of tailings sands.

Keywords:

constitutive model, mechanical behavior, numerical analysis, UBCSAND model, monotonic triaxial test

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Y. Wang et al., "Identification study of soil types based on feature factors of XRF spectrum combining with machine learning," Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, vol. 219, Sep. 2024, Art. no. 107001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2024.107001

C. E. Augarde, S. J. Lee, and D. Loukidis, "Numerical modelling of large deformation problems in geotechnical engineering: A state-of-the-art review," Soils and Foundations, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1718–1735, Dec. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2021.08.007

L. Perkins, A. C. D. Royal, I. Jefferson, and C. D. Hills, "The Use of Recycled and Secondary Aggregates to Achieve a Circular Economy within Geotechnical Engineering," Geotechnics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 416–438, Dec. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics1020020

N. Ecemis, "Experimental and numerical modeling on the liquefaction potential and ground settlement of silt-interlayered stratified sands," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 144, May 2021, Art. no. 106691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106691

C. Monje, G. Suazo, C. Monje, and G. Suazo, "Drained cyclic behavior and minimum payback design in tailings dams," Obras y proyectos, no. 25, pp. 30–34, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132019000100030

G. Bella and G. Musso, "Liquefaction susceptibility of silty tailings under monotonic triaxial tests in nearly saturated conditions," Geomechanics and Engineering, An Int’l Journal, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 247–258, 2024.

X. Chai, Y. Sheng, J. Liu, Y. Xu, and H. Liu, "Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Saturated Tailing Sand with Different Particle Sizes," Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 23, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 12231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312231

D. Zhang, X. Zhang, and W. Du, "DEM-FEM based numerical analysis on mechanical responses of sandy soil and pipeline to seepage erosion," Engineering Geology, vol. 310, Dec. 2022, Art. no. 106868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106868

B. J. Shwan, "Numerical analysis of slopes treated by nano-materials," Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, vol. 32, no. 1, Jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0227

J. G. Liu, B. Xu, L. Sun, B. Li, and G. J. Wei, "In situ stress field in the Athabasca oil sands deposits: Field measurement, stress-field modeling, and engineering implications," Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 215, Aug. 2022, Art. no. 110671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110671

X. Ouyang, Z. Wu, B. Shan, Q. Chen, and C. Shi, "A critical review on compressive behavior and empirical constitutive models of concrete," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 323, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 126572, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126572

M. J. R. Vargas, R. L. H. Enrique, F. J. G. Bautista, Á. B. L. Pérez, and A. C. B. Ramos, "Structural analysis of a rigid solid frame structure," Dominio de las Ciencias, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 321–335, Jul. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23857/dc.v9i3.3445

V. M. Sadovskii, O. V. Sadovskaya, and I. E. Petrakov, "On the theory of constitutive equations for composites with different resistance in compression and tension," Composite Structures, vol. 268, Jul. 2021, Art. no. 113921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113921

F. dell’Isola and M. Stilz, "The «materialization» of forces: Why confounding mathematical concept and physical entity makes the design of metamaterials arduous," ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 103, no. 2, 2023, Art. no. e202200433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202200433

I. van Zelst, F. Crameri, A. E. Pusok, A. Glerum, J. Dannberg, and C. Thieulot, "101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth," Solid Earth, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 583–637, Mar. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022

A. de O. Faria, B. G. Delgado, L. D. Ferreira, and M. P. dos Santos Junior, "Comparative evaluation of constitutive models for stress-strain analysis of an iron ore tailings from the Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais, Brazil," Soils and Rocks, vol. 47, 2023, Art. no. e2024011022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2024.011022

R. Kabo, M.-A. Bourgault, J. F. Bissonnette, N. Barrette, and L. Tanguay, "Use of Mixed Methods in the Science of Hydrological Extremes: What Are Their Contributions?," Hydrology, vol. 10, no. 6, Jun. 2023, Art. no. 130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10060130

B. Peters, B. Eddy, D. Galvin-McLaughlin, G. Betz, B. Oken, and M. Fried-Oken, "A systematic review of research on augmentative and alternative communication brain-computer interface systems for individuals with disabilities," Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 16, Jul. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.952380

A. C. Schindele and M. and Lindroth, "Sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) among young people in secure state care and their non-incarcerated peers – a qualitative, descriptive and comparative study," European Journal of Social Work, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 657–670, Jul. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1815658

R. J. Pidduck, D. M. Townsend, and L. W. Busenitz, "Non-probabilistic reasoning in navigating entrepreneurial uncertainty: A psychology of religious faith lens," Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 39, no. 4, Jul. 2024, Art. no. 106392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106392

K. Linka, M. Hillgärtner, K. P. Abdolazizi, R. C. Aydin, M. Itskov, and C. J. Cyron, "Constitutive artificial neural networks: A fast and general approach to predictive data-driven constitutive modeling by deep learning," Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 429, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 110010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110010

J.-C. Chou, H.-T. Yang, and D.-G. Lin, "Calibration of Finn Model and UBCSAND Model for Simplified Liquefaction Analysis Procedures," Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 11, Jun. 2021, Art. no. 5283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115283

R. Verdugo, "Static liquefaction in the context of steady state/critical state and its application in the stability of tailings dams," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 176, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 108270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108270

F. Qamar and S. Qin, "Development of Nonlinear Finite Element Models of Mortar-Free Interlocked Single Block Column Subjected to Lateral Loading," Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 11047–11062, Nov. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05668-7

L. U. Argiento, Celano ,Thomas, Ceroni ,Francesca, and C. and Casapulla, "Modelling Strategies for the In-plane Behaviour of Iron-framed Masonry Structures: Parametric Analysis on Simple Panels and a Church Façade," International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1006–1031, Jul. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1858369

D. Arndt et al., "The deal.II finite element library: Design, features, and insights," Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 81, pp. 407–422, Jan. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.022

S. Maraš-Dragojević, "Use of finite element method for 2D and 3D analyses of tunnelling induced settlements," Građevinar, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 673–680, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2119.2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2119.2017

S. Giridharan, S. Gowda, D. F. E. Stolle, and C. Moormann, "Comparison of UBCSAND and Hypoplastic soil model predictions using the Material Point Method," Soils and Foundations, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 989–1000, Aug. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.06.001

E. Voyagaki, T. Kishida, R. F. Aldulaimi, and G. Mylonakis, "Integration and calibration of UBCSAND model for drained monotonic and cyclic triaxial compression of aggregates," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 171, Aug. 2023, Art. no. 107978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107978

N.-P. Doan, B.-P. Nguyen, and S.-S. Park, "Seismic deformation analysis of earth dams subject to liquefaction using UBCSAND2 model," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 172, Sep. 2023, Art. no. 108003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108003

S.-S. Park, "A two mobilized-plane model and its application for soil liquefaction analysis," PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, CA, 2005.

D. Figueira, C. Sousa, and A. S. Neves, "Constitutive Model for Aggregate Interlock in FEM Analyses of Concrete Interfaces with Embedded Steel Bars," International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, Mar. 2020, Art. no. 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0390-8

A. B. Tsegaye, "Plaxis Liquefaction Model," Delf, Netherlands, Technical Report 1, 2010.

Y. Feng, "Dynamic response of tunnel through water-rich liquefiable layer based on UBC3D-PLM model," Vibroengineering Procedia, vol. 49, pp. 51–55, May 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2023.23219

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Reyes Roque, R.M., Chinchay Poma, G.M., Cespedes Reynaga, H.F., Madera Teran, R. and Casas Luna, S.A. 2025. Mechanical Behavior of Tailings Sands: A Numerical Analysis using the UBCSAND Constitutive Model. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 15, 3 (Jun. 2025), 23095–23104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10380.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 81
PDF Downloads: 42

Metrics Information