Application of LightGBM Algorithm in Production Scheduling Optimization on Non-Identical Parallel Machines

Authors

Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 17973-17978 | December 2024 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8779

Abstract

Production scheduling plays a decisive role in supply chain management, directly influencing the operational efficiency and competitiveness of companies. This study explores the effectiveness of the LightGBM algorithm for production scheduling on non-identical parallel machines, comparing it to algorithms such as logistic regression, KNN, decision tree, and XGBoost. LightGBM was chosen for its speed of execution and its ability to handle large amounts of data. The results show that LightGBM outperforms the other models in terms of RMSE, MAE, explained variance score, and R² score for regression tasks, as well as in classification accuracy for certain features. Its superiority is attributed to its ability to efficiently handle data complexity while reducing computational complexity through its leaf tree growth technique. This study highlights LightGBM's potential for improving the efficiency of supply chain management systems and the challenges associated with computational scalability for large datasets. The results suggest that LightGBM is a robust and effective solution to optimize production scheduling, paving the way for future research in this field.

Keywords:

production scheduling, parallel machines, machine learning, LightGBM, optimization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. C. Ying, P. Pourhejazy, and X. Y. Huang, "Revisiting the development trajectory of parallel machine scheduling," Computers & Operations Research, vol. 168, Aug. 2024, Art. no. 106709.

M. Alanazi, R. S. Aldahr, and M. Ilyas, "Human Activity Recognition through Smartphone Inertial Sensors with ML Approach," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12780–12787, Feb. 2024.

L. Li, Z. Liu, J. Shen, F. Wang, W. Qi, and S. Jeon, "A LightGBM-based strategy to predict tunnel rockmass class from TBM construction data for building control," Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 58, Oct. 2023, Art. no. 102130.

M. Rohaninejad, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, B. Vahedi-Nouri, Z. Hanzálek, and S. Shirazian, "A hybrid learning-based meta-heuristic algorithm for scheduling of an additive manufacturing system consisting of parallel SLM machines," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 60, no. 20, pp. 6205–6225, Oct. 2022.

H. Togo, K. Asanuma, T. Nishi, and Z. Liu, "Machine Learning and Inverse Optimization for Estimation of Weighting Factors in Multi-Objective Production Scheduling Problems," Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 19, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 9472.

F. Li, S. Lang, B. Hong, and T. Reggelin, "A two-stage RNN-based deep reinforcement learning approach for solving the parallel machine scheduling problem with due dates and family setups," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1107–1140, Mar. 2024.

A. Uzunoglu, C. Gahm, S. Wahl, and A. Tuma, "Learning-augmented heuristics for scheduling parallel serial-batch processing machines," Computers & Operations Research, vol. 151, Mar. 2023, Art. no. 106122.

A. Uzunoglu, C. Gahm, and A. Tuma, "A machine learning enhanced multi-start heuristic to efficiently solve a serial-batch scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, vol. 338, no. 1, pp. 407–428, Jul. 2024.

C. L. Liu, C. J. Tseng, T. H. Huang, and J. W. Wang, "Dynamic Parallel Machine Scheduling With Deep Q-Network," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 6792–6804, Aug. 2023.

H. Yamashiro and H. Nonaka, "Estimation of processing time using machine learning and real factory data for optimization of parallel machine scheduling problem," Operations Research Perspectives, vol. 8, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 100196.

K. A. B. Hamou, Z. Jarir, and S. Elfirdoussi, "Design of a Machine Learning-based Decision Support System for Product Scheduling on Non Identical Parallel Machines," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 16317–16325, Oct. 2024.

Y. Li et al., "A K-means-Teaching Learning based optimization algorithm for parallel machine scheduling problem," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 161, Aug. 2024, Art. no. 111746.

G. Ke et al., "LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree," in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA, Sep. 2017, pp. 3149–3157.

D. Wang, L. Li, and D. Zhao, "Corporate finance risk prediction based on LightGBM," Information Sciences, vol. 602, pp. 259–268, Jul. 2022.

T. O. Hodson, "Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): when to use them or not," Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 5481–5487, Jul. 2022.

D. Chicco, M. J. Warrens, and G. Jurman, "The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation," PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 7, Jul. 2021, Art. no. e623.

Ž. Ð. Vujovic, "Classification Model Evaluation Metrics," International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 12, no. 6, 2021.

S. Nuanmeesri, "A Hybrid Deep Learning and Optimized Machine Learning Approach for Rose Leaf Disease Classification," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 7678–7683, Oct. 2021.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Ait Ben Hamou, K., Jarir, Z. and Elfirdoussi, S. 2024. Application of LightGBM Algorithm in Production Scheduling Optimization on Non-Identical Parallel Machines. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 14, 6 (Dec. 2024), 17973–17978. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8779.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 138
PDF Downloads: 141

Metrics Information

Most read articles by the same author(s)