AMPS-1D Simulation of P3HT Solar Cells: Impact of HOMO-LUMO Offset, Thickness, Temperature, and Optical Bandgap on Performance

Authors

  • Hadab Al-Otaibi Department of Physics, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia
  • Omer I. Eid Department of Physics, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia | Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
  • M. E. M. Eisa Department of Physics, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia
  • Amwaj N. Alzahrani Physics Department, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 18120-18124 | December 2024 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8735

Abstract

This study employed the AMPS-1D software to investigate the relationship between the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and the energy difference between the Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital (HOMO) of the donor and the Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) of the acceptor in P3HT:PCBM bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. The findings indicate a correlation between Voc and the HOMO-LUMO offset up to 1.1 eV, after which Voc remains constant. This behavior is further elucidated using a theorem based on the quasi-Fermi level, which predicts a Voc of 0.64 V, in good agreement with our simulation result of 0.68 V. The Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) of the solar cell was studied with respect to the active layer thickness, demonstrating an increase in PCE up to 0.40 μm followed by a decrease, yielding a maximum PCE of 5.023%, consistent with the literature. The effect of temperature on PCE was also examined, demonstrating an increase in PCE with decreasing temperature in the range of 150–320 K, with a performance of 6.371% at 150 K. Furthermore, the impact of the optical bandgap on PCE was explored, showing that the PCE increased with a decrease in the optical bandgap of the P3HT:PCBM solar cell, reaching 9.94% when the optical bandgap was 1.5 eV. These findings provide valuable insights into the optimization of the performance of organic solar cells by manipulating key parameters, such as the HOMO-LUMO offset, active layer thickness, temperature, and optical bandgap.

Keywords:

organic bulk heterojunction solar cell, P3HT:PCBM, AMPS-1D, power conversion efficiency, open-circuit voltage, optical bandgap

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Wadsworth, Z. Hamid, J. Kosco, N. Gasparini, and I. McCulloch, "The Bulk Heterojunction in Organic Photovoltaic, Photodetector, and Photocatalytic Applications," Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 38, 2020, Art. no. 2001763.

A. R. Murad, A. Iraqi, S. B. Aziz, S. N. Abdullah, and M. A. Brza, "Conducting Polymers for Optoelectronic Devices and Organic Solar Cells: A Review," Polymers, vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2020, Art. no. 2627.

L. M. A. de Jong et al., "Enhancement of the internal quantum efficiency in strongly coupled P3HT-C60 organic photovoltaic cells using Fabry–Perot cavities with varied cavity confinement," Nanophotonics, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 2531–2540, Jun. 2024.

A. Karki et al., "Understanding the High Performance of over 15% Efficiency in Single-Junction Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells," Advanced Materials, vol. 31, no. 48, 2019, Art. no. 1903868.

M. Abdallaoui, N. Sengouga, A. Chala, A. F. Meftah, and A. M. Meftah, "Comparative study of conventional and inverted P3HT: PCBM organic solar cell," Optical Materials, vol. 105, Jul. 2020, Art. no. 109916.

S. Holliday et al., "High-efficiency and air-stable P3HT-based polymer solar cells with a new non-fullerene acceptor," Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, Jun. 2016, Art. no. 11585.

N. Chander, S. Singh, and S. S. K. Iyer, "Stability and reliability of P3HT:PC61BM inverted organic solar cells," Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 161, pp. 407–415, Mar. 2017.

G. Grancharov et al., "Flexible Polymer–Organic Solar Cells Based on P3HT:PCBM Bulk Heterojunction Active Layer Constructed under Environmental Conditions," Molecules, vol. 26, no. 22, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 6890.

O. Ghazy, B. Freisinger, I. Lieberwith, and K. Landfester, "Tuning the size and morphology of P3HT/PCBM composite nanoparticles: towards optimized water-processable organic solar cells," Nanoscale, vol. 12, no. 44, pp. 22798–22807, Nov. 2020.

M. T. Dang, L. Hirsch, and G. Wantz, "P3HT:PCBM, Best Seller in Polymer Photovoltaic Research," Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 31, pp. 3597–3602, 2011.

M. Shaban, M. Benghanem, A. Almohammedi, and M. Rabia, "Optimization of the Active Layer P3HT:PCBM for Organic Solar Cell," Coatings, vol. 11, no. 7, Jul. 2021, Art. no. 863.

M. J. Husen, F. G. Aga, and S. T. Dibaba, "Theoretical Performance Analysis of Inverted P3HT: PCBM Based Bulk Hetero-Junction Organic Solar Cells through Simulation," Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2023, no. 1, 2023, Art. no. 4204298.

S. Sen and R. Islam, "Effect of Different Layers on the Performance of P3HT:PCBM-Based Organic Solar Cell," Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1661–1669, Dec. 2021.

I. Malti, A. Chiali, and N. C. Sari, "Numerical study of electrical behavior of P3HT/PCBM bulk heterojunction solar cell," Applied Solar Energy, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 122–127, Apr. 2016.

A. M. Mir, F. Bashir, F. A. Khanday, F. Zahoor, M. Hanif, and Z. May, "Design and Optimization of High Performance P3HT: PCBM Polymer Solar Cell Using P3HT Buffer Layer," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 10961–10969, 2024.

A. Ng et al., "P3HT : PCBM solar cells—The choice of source material," Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 131, no. 2, 2014.

B. Kadem, A. Hassan, and W. Cranton, "Efficient P3HT:PCBM bulk heterojunction organic solar cells; effect of post deposition thermal treatment," Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 7038–7048, Jul. 2016.

J. C. Byers, S. Ballantyne, K. Rodionov, A. Mann, and O. A. Semenikhin, "Mechanism of Recombination Losses in Bulk Heterojunction P3HT:PCBM Solar Cells Studied Using Intensity Modulated Photocurrent Spectroscopy," ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 392–401, Feb. 2011.

E. Winsberg, "Computer Simulations in Science," in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2022., E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, Eds. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2022.

D. K. Shah, D. Kc, M. Muddassir, M. S. Akhtar, C. Y. Kim, and O.-B. Yang, "A simulation approach for investigating the performances of cadmium telluride solar cells using doping concentrations, carrier lifetimes, thickness of layers, and band gaps," Solar Energy, vol. 216, pp. 259–265, Mar. 2021.

B. M. Omer, A. Khogali, and A. Pivrikas, "AMPS-1D modeling of P3HT/PCBM bulk-heterojunction solar cell," in 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Seattle, USA, Jun. 2011, pp. 000734–000743.

J. Munshi and G. Balasubramanian, "Investigating blend morphology of P3HT:PCBM bulk heterojunction solar cells by classical atomistic simulations – Progress and prospects," Soft Materials, vol. 18, no. 2–3, pp. 163–176, Jul. 2020.

T. L. Benanti and D. Venkataraman, "Organic Solar Cells: An Overview Focusing on Active Layer Morphology," Photosynthesis Research, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 73–81, Jan. 2006.

M. M. Mandoc, L. J. A. Koster, and P. W. M. Blom, "Optimum charge carrier mobility in organic solar cells," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, no. 13, Mar. 2007, Art. no. 133504.

V. d. Mihailetchi et al., "Electron Transport in a Methanofullerene," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 43–46, 2003.

L. J. A. Koster, E. C. P. Smits, V. D. Mihailetchi, and P. W. M. Blom, "Device model for the operation of polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells," Physical Review B, vol. 72, no. 8, Aug. 2005, Art. no. 085205.

E. A. Schiff, "Low-mobility solar cells: a device physics primer with application to amorphous silicon," Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 567–595, Jul. 2003.

K. Lobato, L. M. Peter, and U. Würfel, "Direct Measurement of the Internal Electron Quasi-Fermi Level in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells Using a Titanium Secondary Electrode," The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 33, pp. 16201–16204, Aug. 2006.

P. Caprioglio et al., "On the Relation between the Open-Circuit Voltage and Quasi-Fermi Level Splitting in Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells," Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 9, no. 33, 2019, Art. no. 1901631.

L. J. A. Koster, V. D. Mihailetchi, and P. W. M. Blom, "Bimolecular recombination in polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 5, Jan. 2006, Art. no. 052104.

L. J. A. Koster, V. D. Mihailetchi, and P. W. M. Blom, "Ultimate efficiency of polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 9, Mar. 2006, Art. no. 093511.

Y. Sun, T. Liu, Y. Kan, K. Gao, B. Tang, and Y. Li, "Flexible Organic Solar Cells: Progress and Challenges," Small Science, vol. 1, no. 5, 2021, Art. no. 2100001.

N. K. Elumalai and A. Uddin, "Open circuit voltage of organic solar cells: an in-depth review," Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 391–410, Feb. 2016.

B. M. Omer and A. Merazga, "On the applicability of Schottky diffusion theory to non-ohmic cathode contact P3HT:PCBM bulk-hetero junction solar cell," AIP Advances, vol. 11, no. 2, Feb. 2021, Art. no. 025140.

Z. Bahrami, A. Salehi, and A. M. Eyvaraghi, "AMPS-1D Modelling of P3HT/PCBM Bilayer and BHJ Organic Solar Cell," in 2019 27th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Yazd, Iran, Apr. 2019, pp. 41–45.

A. E. Karkri, Z. E. Malki, M. Bouachrine, F. Serein-Spirau, and J.-M. Sotiropoulos, "Characterization and simulation study of organic solar cells based on donor–acceptor (D–π–A) molecular materials," RSC Advances, vol. 10, no. 32, pp. 18816–18823, May 2020.

J. Wong, S. T. Omelchenko, and H. A. Atwater, "Impact of Semiconductor Band Tails and Band Filling on Photovoltaic Efficiency Limits," ACS Energy Letters, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 52–57, Jan. 2021.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Al-Otaibi, H., Eid, O.I., Eisa, M.E.M. and Alzahrani, A.N. 2024. AMPS-1D Simulation of P3HT Solar Cells: Impact of HOMO-LUMO Offset, Thickness, Temperature, and Optical Bandgap on Performance. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 14, 6 (Dec. 2024), 18120–18124. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8735.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 102
PDF Downloads: 137

Metrics Information

Most read articles by the same author(s)