Pixel Binning Effects of Smartphone Camera on Three-Dimensional (3D) Model Reconstructed Crime Scene

Authors

  • Shahrul Izwan Sukri Geospatial Imaging and Information Research Group (GI2RG), Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohd Farid Mohd Ariff UTM-PDRM Geospatial Forensics Satellite Laboratory, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Firdaus Razali Geospatial Imaging and Information Research Group (GI2RG), Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Khairulazhar Zainuddin Geo3DM Research Interest Group, College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis Campus, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Razali Yusof Department of Geotechnical and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Volume: 14 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 17344-17349 | October 2024 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8309

Abstract

Pixel binning, a feature of high-megapixel smartphone cameras, exhibits performance comparable to traditional cameras. The field of photogrammetry has explored and adopted most kinds of technology, hence, pixel binning too should be adopted into forensic photogrammetry. This study evaluates the application of pixel binning technology in forensic photogrammetry, specifically in 3D reconstruction at crime scenes. A simulated crime scene conducted at the UTM-PDRM lab was captured using smartphone cameras of 12MP and 50MP, and a 20MP DSLR camera. First, the cameras were calibrated to ensure their stability. Following the image capture, the data were processed to generate 3D point cloud models of the simulated crime scene. The geometric parameters resulting from the camera calibration were discussed. The 3D point cloud model by DSLR camera exhibited better visual quality than the smartphone cameras. This finding was supported by an analysis of overlapping images by each camera and a side-by-side comparison of the models. Measurements from the smartphones 1, 2 and the DSLR camera were compared to conventional Vernier calipers used in crime scene documentation. The resulting Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) differences were approximately ±5.62mm, ±5.59mm, and ±5.40mm, respectively. In conclusion, the pixel binning of smartphone cameras was able to produce reliable accuracy but requires stability in technology for 3D reconstruction.

Keywords:

pixel binning, smartphone camera, close-range photogrammetry, 3D model, crime scene reconstruction

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Raneri, "Enhancing forensic investigation through the use of modern three-dimensional (3D) imaging technologies for crime scene reconstruction," Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 697–707, Nov. 2018.

G. Galanakis et al., "A Study of 3D Digitisation Modalities for Crime Scene Investigation," Forensic Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 56–85, Sep. 2021.

M. A. Abbas et al., "Quality Assessment of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Surface Deviation Analysis in Vegetation Slope Monitoring," Engineering Letters, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 22–30, Mar. 2020.

A. Kovaleva, E. Frolova, and Y. Demidchenko, "Application of Leading and Innovative 3D Technologies for Crime Investigation," in 6th International Conference on Social, economic, and academic leadership, Prague, Czech Republic, Dec. 2019, pp. 458–463.

R. Tredinnick, S. Smith, and K. Ponto, "A cost-benefit analysis of 3D scanning technology for crime scene investigation," Forensic Science International: Reports, vol. 1, Nov. 2019, Art. no. 100025.

A. N. Sazaly, M. F. M. Ariff, and A. F. Razali, "3D Indoor Crime Scene Reconstruction from Micro UAV Photogrammetry Technique," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 12020–12025, Dec. 2023.

K. N. Tahar, M. A. Asmadin, S. a. H. Sulaiman, N. Khalid, A. N. Idris, and M. H. Razali, "Individual Tree Crown Detection Using UAV Orthomosaic," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 7047–7053, Apr. 2021.

M. Froehlich and S. Azhar, "Handheld simultaneous localization and mapping devices for 3D scanning," in 33rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Auburn, AL, USA, Jul. 2016, pp. 1–9.

V. Berezowski, X. Mallett, and I. Moffat, "Geomatic techniques in forensic science: A review," Science & Justice, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 99–107, Mar. 2020.

H. Larsen, M. Budka, and M. R. Bennett, "Technological innovation in the recovery and analysis of 3D forensic footwear evidence: Structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry," Science & Justice, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 356–368, Jul. 2021.

R. Omari, C. Hunt, J. Coumbaros, and B. Chapman, "Virtual anthropology? Reliability of three-dimensional photogrammetry as a forensic anthropology measurement and documentation technique," International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 939–950, May 2021.

A. F. Razali, M. F. M. Ariff, Z. Majid, and H. A. Hamid, "Statistical Assessment for Point Cloud Dataset," in 19th IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications, Kedah, Malaysia, Mar. 2023, pp. 42–47.

G. Lauria, L. Sineo, and S. Ficarra, "A detailed method for creating digital 3D models of human crania: an example of close-range photogrammetry based on the use of Structure-from-Motion (SfM) in virtual anthropology," Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, Feb. 2022, Art. no. 42.

S. Stehel, P. Vertal, and L. Demcakova, "Application of Close-Range Photogrammetry in Documenting the Location of an Accident," Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 55, pp. 1657–1664, Jan. 2021.

R. Azmil, M. F. M. Ariff, A. F. Razali, S. N. Azmy, N. Darwin, and K. M. Idris, "Transforming Physical Crime Scene into Geospatial-based Point Cloud Data," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 13974–13981, Jun. 2024.

A. F. Razali, M. F. M. Ariff, and Z. Majid, "A hybrid point cloud reality capture from terrestrial laser scanning and UAV-photogrammetry," The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 459–463, Feb. 2022.

Y. Yoo, J. Im, and J. Paik, "Low-Light Image Enhancement Using Adaptive Digital Pixel Binning," Sensors, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 14917–14931, Jul. 2015.

S. Zancajo-Blazquez, D. Gonzalez-Aguilera, H. Gonzalez-Jorge, and D. Hernandez-Lopez, "An Automatic Image-Based Modelling Method Applied to Forensic Infography," PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 3, Mar. 2015, Art. no. e0118719.

L. Baker, "What is pixel binning? How smartphones squeeze in so many megapixels," Pocket-lint. https://www.pocket-lint.com/what-is-pixel-binning-how-smartphones-squeeze-in-so-many-megapixels/.

M. F. M. Ariff, A. K. Chong, Z. Majid, and H. Setan, "Geometric and radiometric characteristics of a prototype surveillance system," Measurement, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 610–620, Jan. 2013.

D. Abate, I. Toschi, C. Sturdy-Colls, and F. Remondino, "A low-cost panoramic camera for the 3d documentation of contaminated crime scenes," The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 42, pp. 1–8, Nov. 2017.

NFSTC, Crime Scene Investigation A Guide for Law Enforcement. Largo, FL, USA: National Forensic Science Technology Center, 2013.

X. Jin and K. Hirakawa, "Analysis and processing of pixel binning for color image sensor," EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2012, no. 1, Jun. 2012, Art. no. 125.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Sukri, S.I., Mohd Ariff, M.F., Razali, A.F., Zainuddin, K. and Yusof, A.R. 2024. Pixel Binning Effects of Smartphone Camera on Three-Dimensional (3D) Model Reconstructed Crime Scene. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 14, 5 (Oct. 2024), 17344–17349. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8309.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 49
PDF Downloads: 29

Metrics Information

Most read articles by the same author(s)