Application of the TOPSIS Method for Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox

Authors

  • Huu-Danh Tran Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Vinh Long University of Technology Education, 73 Nguyen Hue Street, Ward 2, Vinh Long City 85110, Vietnam
  • Van-Thanh Dinh East Asia University of Technology, Trinh Van Bo Street, Hanoi City 12000, Vietnam
  • Duc-Binh Vu Viet Tri University of Industry, 09 Tien Son Street, Viet Tri City 35100, Vietnam
  • Duong Vu School of Engineering and Technology, Duy Tan University, 03 Quang Trung Street, Hai Chau Ward, Da Nang City 50000, Vietnam
  • Anh-Tung Luu Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Thai Nguyen University of Technology, 3/2 Street, Tich Luong Ward, Thai Nguyen City 251750, Vietnam
  • Ngoc Pi Vu Thai Nguyen University of Technology, 3/2 Street, Tich Luong Ward, Thai Nguyen City 251750, Vietnam
Volume: 14 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 15454-15463 | August 2024 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7551

Abstract

In order to design a high-efficiency two-stage gearbox to reduce power loss and conserve energy, a Multi-Criterion Decision-Making (MCDM) method is selected for solving the Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (MOOP) in this research. The study's objective is to determine the best primary design factors that will increase gearbox efficiency and decrease gearbox mass. To that end, the first stage's gear ratio and the first and second stages' Coefficients of Wheel Face Width (CWFW) were chosen as the three main design elements. Furthermore, two distinct goals were analyzed: the lowest gearbox mass and the highest gearbox efficiency. Additionally, the MOOP is carried out in two steps: phase 1 solves the Single-Objective Optimization Problem (SOOP) to close the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal primary design factors. Furthermore, the TOPSIS approach was selected to address the MOOP. For the first time, an MCDM technique is used to solve the MOOP of a two-stage helical gearbox considering the power losses during idle motion. When designing the gearbox, the optimal values for three crucial design parameters were ascertained according to the study's results.

Keywords:

gearbox, two-stage helical gearbox, gear ratio, multi-objective optimization, TOPSIS method

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Miler, D. Žeželj, A. Lončar, and K. Vučković, "Multi-objective spur gear pair optimization focused on volume and efficiency," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 125, pp. 185–195, Jul. 2018.

M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and K. Shankar, "Multi-objective optimization of the two-stage helical gearbox with tribological constraints," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 138, pp. 38–57, Aug. 2019.

E. B. Younes, C. Changenet, J. Bruyère, E. Rigaud, and J. Perret-Liaudet, "Multi-objective optimization of gear unit design to improve efficiency and transmission error," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 167, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 104499.

S. Kim, S. Moon, J. Sohn, Y. Park, C. Choi, and G. Lee, "Macro geometry optimization of a helical gear pair for mass, efficiency, and transmission error," Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 144, Feb. 2020, Art. no. 103634.

E. S. Maputi and R. Arora, "Multi-objective optimization of a 2-stage spur gearbox using NSGA-II and decision-making methods," Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 42, no. 9, Aug. 2020, Art. no. 477.

G. Istenes and J. Polák, "Investigating the Effect of Gear Ratio in the Case of Joint Multi-Objective Optimization of Electric Motor and Gearbox," Energies, vol. 17, no. 5, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 1203.

A. Kumar, P. Ramkumar, and K. Shankar, "Multi-objective 3-stage wind turbine gearbox (WTG) with tribological constraint," Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, pp. 1–27.

M. Patil, P. Ramkumar, and K. Shankar, "Multi-Objective Optimization of Spur Gearbox with Inclusion of Tribological Aspects," Journal of Friction and Wear, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 430–436, Nov. 2017.

X.-H. Le and N.-P. Vu, "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 13, Jan. 2023, Art. no. 7601.

V.-T. Dinh et al., "Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear-Sets Using TOPSIS Method," Processes, vol. 12, no. 6, Jun. 2024.

T. Q. Huy, N. V. Binh, D. V. Thanh, T. H. Danh, and N. V. Trang, "Optimization of a Two-stage Helical Gearbox with Second Stage Double Gear Sets to Reduce Gearbox Mass and Increase Gearbox Efficiency," WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, vol. 18, pp. 287–298, 2023.

M. Sreenatha and P. B. Mallikarjuna, "A Fault Diagnosis Technique for Wind Turbine Gearbox: An Approach using Optimized BLSTM Neural Network with Undercomplete Autoencoder," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 10170–10174, Feb. 2023.

J. A. Martins and E. C. Romao, "Fracture Analysis of a Cycloidal Gearbox as a Yaw Drive on a Wind Turbine," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12640–12645, Feb. 2024.

Y. Berrouche, "A Non-Parametric Empirical Method for Nonlinear and Non-Stationary Signal Analysis," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8058–8062, Feb. 2022.

X. Xu et al., "Optimization Design for the Planetary Gear Train of an Electric Vehicle under Uncertainties," Actuators, vol. 11, no. 2, Feb. 2022, Art. no. 49.

T. C. Phokane, K. Gupta, and C. Anghel, "Optimization of Gear Manufacturing for Quality and Productivity," Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 20–27, May 2022.

A. Shivade and S. Sapkal, "Selection of optimum plant layout using AHP-TOPSIS and WASPAS approaches coupled with Entropy method," Decision Science Letters, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 545–562, Jan. 2022.

I. Römhild and H. Linke, "Gezielte Auslegung von Zahnradgetrieben mit minimaler masse auf der basis neuer Berechnungsverfahren," Konstruktion, vol. 44, no. 7–8, pp. 229–236, 1992.

T. Chat and L. Van Uyen, Design and Calculation of Mechanical Transmissions Systems, vol. 1, Hanoi, Vietnam: Educational Republishing House, 2007.

D. Jelaska, Gears and Gear Drives. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012.

E. Buckingham, Analytical Mechanics of Gears. Dover Publications, 2011.

C.-L. Hwang, Y.-J. Lai, and T.-Y. Liu, "A new approach for multiple objective decision making," Computers & Operations Research, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 889–899, Oct. 1993.

T. T. Hieu, N. X. Thao, L. Thuy, "Application of MOORA and COPRAS models to select materials for mushroom cultivation," Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 32-2331, 2019.

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
Tran, H.-D., Dinh, V.-T., Vu, D.-B., Vu, D., Luu, A.-T. and Vu, N.P. 2024. Application of the TOPSIS Method for Multi-Objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Helical Gearbox. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 14, 4 (Aug. 2024), 15454–15463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7551.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 187
PDF Downloads: 333

Metrics Information

Most read articles by the same author(s)