A Generic Feature Extraction Approach for Dealing with Multiple Attribute Decision Analysis Problems under Risk and Uncertainty

  • M. Z. Hasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0132-1717
  • S. Hossain Department of Computer Science and Engineering, International Islamic University Chittagong, Bangladesh
  • M. S. Uddin Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh
  • M. S. Islam Institute of Information Technology, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh
Keywords: multi-attribute, decision problem, feature extraction, knowledge base, uncertainty, risk, cross evaluation


This paper represents a generic feature extraction approach to handle multiple attribute decision analysis problems. For that purpose, available decision support frameworks are carefully studied and the basic types of attributes involved in the decision problems are identified. Based on this analysis, a generic decision support scheme is proposed that can deal with all sorts of attributes in order to deduce the optimal solution for any decision problem. The proposed framework is capable of handling multiple attributes throughout the process of providing a flawless solution for the decision problem under both risk and uncertainty. This paper provides detailed information about the sources of uncertainty in the decision-making process and proposes a sophisticated approach for capturing all sorts of uncertainties. In the proposed approach, a cross assessment of every attribute against the corresponding attribute of the other alternatives is conducted to extract the significant features of an attribute. The relative importance of every attribute is considered as a supporting knowledge representation parameter in order to optimize the attribute-assessment process. The final decision is made based on the numerical scores seized by the alternatives. The paper also represents a numerical study to demonstrate the potential applications of the proposed methodology.


Download data is not yet available.


V. Belton, T. J. Stewart, Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach, Kluwer Academic, 2002

C. L. Huang, K. Yoon, Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications: A state-of-art survey, Springer, 1981

B. Roy, D. Vanderpooten, “The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works”, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 22–38, 1996

T. L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, 1980

T. J. Stewart, “A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice”, Omega, Vol. 20, No. 5-6, pp. 569–586, 1992

J. B. Yang, M. G. Singh, “An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1–18, 1994

N. Benmoussa, A. Elyamami, K. Mansouri, M. Qbadou, E. Illoussamen, “A multi-criteria decision making approach for enhancing university accreditation process”, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 3726-3733, 2019

B. Trstenjak, B. Palasek, J. Trstenjak, “A decision support system for the prediction of wastewater pumping station failures based on CBR continuous learning model”, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 4745-4749, 2019

J. Wallenius, J. S. Dyer, P. C. Fishburn, R. E. Steuer, S. Zionts, K. Deb, “Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead”, Management Science, Vol. 54, No. 7, pp. 1336–1349, 2008

W. Ho, X. Xu, P. K. Dey, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 202, No. 1, pp. 16–24, 2010

G. A. Miller, “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information”, Psychological Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 81-97, 1956

L. Hurwicz, “The generalized bayes minimax principle: A criterion for decision making uncer ucertainty”, Cowles Commition Discussion Paper: Statistics No 355, 1951

C. W. Churchman, R. L. Ackoff, “An approximate measure of value”, Journal of the Operational Research Society of America, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 107–226, 1954

T. L. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy process: What it is and how it is used”, Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 9, No. 3-5, pp. 161-176, 1987

P. K. Dey, “Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 90–103, 2006

H. Deng, C. H. Yeh, R. J. Willis, “Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights”, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 27, No. 10, pp. 963–973, 2000

M. Haddad, D. Sanders, “Selection of discrete multiple criteria decision making methods in the presence of risk and uncertainty”, Operations Research Perspectives, Vol. 5, pp. 357-370, 2018

A. Shanian, O. Savadogo, “TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell”, Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 159, No. 2, pp. 1095–1104, 2006

A. Kelemenis, D. Askounis, “A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 4999–5008, 2010

G. D. Li, D. Yamaguchi, M. Nagai, “A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem”, Mathematical & Computer Modelling, Vol. 46, No. 3-4, pp. 573–581, 2007

L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Computation, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965

I. B. Turksen, “Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 191–210, 1986

S. Miyamoto, “Fuzzy multisets and their generalizations”, in: Workshop on Membrane Computing, Vol. 2235, Springer, 2000

K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986

Z. Xu, “Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment”, Information Sciences, Vol. 168, No. 1-4, pp. 171–184, 2004

V. Torra, “Hesitant fuzzy sets”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 529–539, 2010

R. L. De Mantaras, Approximate reasoning models, Ellis Horwood, 1990

J. B. Yang, D. L. Xu, “On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 289-304, 2002

J. B. Yang, D. L. Xu, “Knowledge-based executive car evaluation using the evidential reasoning approach”, in: Advances in Manufacturing Technology XII, Professional Engineering Publishing, 1998

J. Wang, J. B. Yang, “A subjective safety and cost based decision model for assessing safety requirements specifications”, International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 35–57, 2001

J. B. Yang, J. Liu, J. Wang, H. S. Sii, H. W. Wang, “Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach-RIMER”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 266-285, 2006

J. V. Neumann, O. Morgenstern, Theory of games and economic behavior, Princeton University Press, 2007

M. Allais, “L'extension des theories de l'equilibre economique general et du rendement social au cas du risque”, Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 269-290, 1953 (in French)

D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 263-291, 1979

A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, “Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 297-323, 1992

M. H. Birnbaum, “The nonadditivity of personality impressions”, Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 543-561, 1974

M. H. Birnbaum, A. Chavez, “Tests of theories of decision making: Violations of branch independence and distribution independence”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 161-194, 1997

M. Hazewinkel, Minimax principle, Encyclopaedia of mathematics, Springer, 2001

G. H. Tzeng, J. J. Huang, Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications, Chapman and Hall, 2011

J. Barzilai, “Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 48, No. 12, pp. 1226–1232, 1997



Abstract Views: 112
PDF Downloads: 65

Metrics Information
Bookmark and Share