Ductility Evaluation of Steel Structures with Reduced Beam Sections and Post-Tensioned Cables Using the Finite Element Method

Authors

  • E. H. Mehr Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering) Department, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Arak, Arak, Iran
  • H. R. Saba Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2236-2239 | December 2017 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.1568

Abstract

Given the importance of structure strengthening, this research introduces a particular type of steel structure in which the reduced beam section and post-tensioned cables were used for creating centralized property and preventing the formation of plastic hinges in the beam and columns. After introducing the system, ABAQUS modeling results are compared with a reliable laboratory sample to check its accuracy. Good convergence was seen which shows the modeling accuracy. The results of the model’s nonlinear static analysis revealed that the above steel structure has higher ductility when compared to conventional steel structures. Also, the results showed that with the rising of height, span length and early post-tensioned power of the cables we can increase the ductility of the structure.

Keywords:

post-tensioned cables, reduced beam section, ductility

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. J. Chen, C. H. Yeh, J. M. Chu, “Ductile steel beam-to-column connections for seismic resistance”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 11, pp. 1292-1299, 1996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:11(1292)

N. F. Youssef, D. Bonowitz, J. L. Gross, A survey of steel moment-resisting frame buildings affected by the 1994 Northridge earthquake, US National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.5625

M. D. Engelhardt, T. Winneberger, A. J. Zekany, T. J. Potyraj, “The dogbone connection: Part II”, Modern Steel Construction, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 46-55, 1996

C. W. Roeder, SAC program to assure ductile connection performance, Mazzolani and Tremblay, 2000

J. M. Ricles, R. Sause, M. M. Garlock, C. Zhao, “Posttensioned seismic-resistant connections for steel frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 2, pp. 113-121, 2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(113)

A. Niknam, E. Sanaee, Behavior and seismic design of steel buildings based on the regulation UBC , Hormozgan University Press, 2002

M. M. Garlock, J. M., Ricles, R. Sause, “Experimental studies of full-scale posttensioned steel connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 438-448, 2005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:3(438)

M. Khan Babaei, Investigating seismic behavior of knee bracing system in steel structure, University of Zanjan press, 2004

T. Vidic, P. Fajfar, M. Fischinger, “Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 507-521, 1994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230504

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
E. H. Mehr and H. R. Saba, “Ductility Evaluation of Steel Structures with Reduced Beam Sections and Post-Tensioned Cables Using the Finite Element Method”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2236–2239, Dec. 2017.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 605
PDF Downloads: 339

Metrics Information