Finite Element Based Response Surface Methodology to Optimize Segmental Tunnel Lining

Authors

  • A. Rastbood School of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • Y. Gholipour School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • A. Majdi School of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Volume: 7 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 1504-1514 | April 2017 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.1045

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to optimize the geometrical and engineering characteristics of concrete segments of tunnel lining using Finite Element (FE) based Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Input data for RSM statistical analysis were obtained using FEM. In RSM analysis, thickness (t) and elasticity modulus of concrete segments (E), tunnel height (H), horizontal to vertical stress ratio (K) and position of key segment in tunnel lining ring (θ) were considered as input independent variables. Maximum values of Mises and Tresca stresses and tunnel ring displacement (UMAX) were set as responses. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to investigate the influence of each input variable on the responses. Second-order polynomial equations in terms of influencing input variables were obtained for each response. It was found that elasticity modulus and key segment position variables were not included in yield stresses and ring displacement equations, and only tunnel height and stress ratio variables were included in ring displacement equation. Finally optimization analysis of tunnel lining ring was performed. Due to absence of elasticity modulus and key segment position variables in equations, their values were kept to average level and other variables were floated in related ranges. Response parameters were set to minimum. It was concluded that to obtain optimum values for responses, ring thickness and tunnel height must be near to their maximum and minimum values, respectively and ground state must be similar to hydrostatic conditions.

Keywords:

tunnel, segment, lining, response surface methodology, analysis of variance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

V. Guglielmetti, P. Grasso, A. Mahtab, S. Xu, Mechanized tunnelling in urban areas: design methodology and construction control, CRC Press, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203938515

J. B. O'Carroll, A Guide to Planning, Constructing, and Supervising Earth Pressure Balance TBM Tunneling, Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2005

R. G. A. de Waal, Steel fibre reinforced tunnel segments-for the application in shield driven tunnel linings, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, 2000

C. B. M. Blom, Design philosophy of concrete linings for tunnels in soft soils, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, 2002

A. Majdi, H. Ajamzadeh, K. Emad, “Numerical evaluation of the influence of bolted-and non-bolted joints on segmental tunnel lining behavior in line 4 Tehran subways”, 6th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium - Advances in Rock Engineering, New Delhi, India, October 23-27, 2010

A. M. Wood, “The circular tunnel in elastic ground”, Geotechnique, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 115-127, 1975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.115

H. Duddeck, J. Erdmann, Structural design models for tunnels in soft soil, Underground Space, United States, 1985

I. Hudoba, “Contribution to static analysis of load-bearing concrete tunnel lining built by shield-driven technology”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 55-58, 1997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(97)85298-4

I. W. Group, “Guidelines for the design of shield tunnel lining”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 303-331, 2000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00058-4

K. M. Lee, X. Y. Hou, X. W. Ge, Y. Tang, “An analytical solution for a jointed shield-driven tunnel lining”, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 365-390, 2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.134

Y. Koyama, “Present status and technology of shield tunneling method in Japan”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 145-159, 2003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00040-3

F. Grübl, M. Thewes, “Recommendations of the German working group on design and calculation of shield machines”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 261-261, 2006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.122

L. Lu, X. Lu, P. Fan, “Full-ring experimental study of the lining structure of Shanghai Changjiang tunnel”, 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, 2006

S. Teachavorasinskun, T. Chub-Uppakarn, “Experimental verification of joint effects on segmental tunnel lining”, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 14, pp. 1-8, 2008

N. Do, D. Dias, P. Oreste, I. Djeran-Maigre, “2D numerical investigation of segmental tunnel lining behavior”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 37, pp. 115-127, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.03.008

H. Morgan, “A contribution to the analysis of stress in a circular tunnel”, Geotechnique, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 37-46, 1961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1961.11.1.37

R. E. Ranken, J. Ghaboussi, A. Hendron Jr, Analysis of ground-liner interaction for tunnels, Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary , USA, 1978

C. W. Schwartz, H. H. Einstein, “Simplified Analysis For Ground-structurinet Eraction In Tunneling”, 21st US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), American Rock Mechanics Association, 1980

Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Japanese Standard for Shield Tunnelling, Tokyo,Japan, JSCE, 1996

S. Liao, F. Peng, S. Shen, “Analysis of shearing effect on tunnel induced by load transfer along longitudinal direction”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 421-430, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.07.001

C. Carranza-Torres, B. Rysdahl, M. Kasim, “On the elastic analysis of a circular lined tunnel considering the delayed installation of the support”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 61, pp. 57-85, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.01.010

N. Do, D. Dias, P. Oreste, “3D numerical investigation of mechanized twin tunnels in soft ground–Influence of lagging distance between two tunnel faces”, Engineering Structures, Vol.109, pp. 117-125, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.053

N. Do, D. Dias, P. Oreste, I. Djeran-Maigre, “Behaviour of segmental tunnel linings under seismic loads studied with the hyperstatic reaction method”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 79, Part A, pp. 108-117, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.09.007

N. Do, D. Dias, P. Oreste, “3D numerical investigation on the interaction between mechanized twin tunnels in soft ground”, Environmental Earth Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 2101-2113, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3561-6

N. Do, D. Dias, P. Oreste, I. Djeran-Maigre, “2D numerical investigation of segmental tunnel lining under seismic loading”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 72, pp. 66-76, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.015

ABAQUS/CAE User's Manual, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. 2014

H. Schulze, H. Duddeck, “Spannungen in schildvorgetriebenen Tunneln”, Beton-und Stahlbetonbau, Vol. 59, No. 8, pp. 169-175, 1964

U. A. C. O. Engineering, Tunnels and Shafts in Rock Engineer Manual, EM 1110-2-2901. Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, 1997

German Committee for Underground Construction, Recommendations for static analysis of shield tunnelling machines. Tunnel. 7, pp. 44-58, 2005

K. Bakker, “Structural design of linings for bored tunnels in soft ground”, Heron, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 33-63, 2003

T. Telford, Tunnel lining design guide, British Tunneling Society and the Institution of Civil Engineers. 2004

X. Huang, H. Huang, J. Zhang, “Flattening of jointed shield-driven tunnel induced by longitudinal differential settlements”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 31, pp. 20-32, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.04.002

F. Ye, C. Gou, H. Sun, Y. Liu, Y. Xia, Z. Zhou, “Model test study on effective ratio of segment transverse bending rigidity of shield tunnel”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 41, pp. 193-205, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.12.011

F. Barpi, M. Barbero, D. Peila, “Numerical modelling of ground-tunnel support interaction using bedded-beam-spring model with fuzzy parameters”, Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, Vol. 27, pp. 71-87, 2011

R. H. Myers, D. C. Montgomery, C. M. Anderson-Cook, Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, John Wiley & Sons, 2016

D. C. Montgomery, Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons, 2008

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
A. Rastbood, Y. Gholipour, and A. Majdi, “Finite Element Based Response Surface Methodology to Optimize Segmental Tunnel Lining”, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1504–1514, Apr. 2017.

Metrics

Abstract Views: 877
PDF Downloads: 465 All 252 data used for Statistical Analysis Downloads: 0

Metrics Information