A Study on Ductility of Prestressed Concrete Pier Based on Response Surface Methodology

  • H. Wang Institute of Bridge Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
  • Y. Zhang Institute of Bridge Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
  • S. Qin Numerical Test Research Center for Materials Fracture Mechanics, Dalian University, Dalian, China
Volume: 6 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1253-1257 | December 2016 | https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.855

Abstract

The ductility of prestressed concrete pier is studied based on response surface methodology. Referring to the pervious prestressed concrete pier, based on Box-Behnken design, the ductility of 25 prestressed concrete piers is calculated by numerical method. The relationship between longitudinal reinforcement ratio, shear reinforcement ratio, prestressed tendon quantity, concrete compressive strength and ductility factor is gotten. The influence of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the shear reinforcement ratio, the prestressed tendon quantity and concrete compressive strength to curvature ductility is discussed. Then the ductility regression equation is deduced. The result showed that the influence of the prestressed tendon quantity to the ductility of prestressed concrete pier is significant. With the increasing of the prestressed tendon quantity, the curvature ductility curved reduces. With the increasing of shear reinforcement ratio and compressive strength of concrete, the curvature ductility increases linearly. And the influence of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio to ductility of the prestressed concrete pier is insignificant.

 

Keywords: response surface methodology, experiment design, prestressed concrete, pier, ductility

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. M. Davis, T. M. Janes, M. O. Eberhard, J. F. Stanton, Unbonded Pre-Tensioned Columns for Bridges in Seismic Regions, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Headquartered at the University of California, Berkeley, 2012

J. T. Hewes, M. J. N. Priestley, Seismic Design and Performance of Precast Concrete Segmental Bridge Columns, San Diego, La Jolla, California.: University of California 2002

H. I. Jeong, J. Sakai, S. A. Mahin, Shaking Table Tests and Numerical Investigation of Self-Centering Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns, Berkeley, California.: University of California, Berkeley, 2008

R. Yamashita, D. Sanders, Shake Table Testing and an Analytical Study of Unbonded Prestressed Hollow Concrete Columns Constructed with Precast Segments. Report No.:CCEER 05-09, University of Nevada, 2005

C. A. Cruz-Noguez, M. S. Saiidi, Experimental and Analytical Seismic Studies of a Four-Span Bridge System with Innovative materials. Report No.:CCEER-10-04, University of Nevada, 2010.

S. Motaref, M. Saiidi, D. Sanders, Seismic Response of Precast Bridge Columns with Energy Dissipating Joints, Report No.:CCEER 11-01, University of Nevada, 2011

A. N. Kallias, M. I. Rafiq, “Performance assessment of corroding RC beams using response surface methodology”, Engineering Structures, Vol.49, pp. 671-685, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.015

J. Bi, H. Fang, Q. Wang, X. Ren, “Modeling and optimization of foam-filled thin-walled columns for crashworthiness designs”, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 798-709, 2010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2010.03.008

J. Seo, D. G. Linzell, “Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment”, Engineering Structures, Vol.34, pp. 21–32, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.008

M. N. Hosseinpour, G. D. Najafpour, H. Younesi, M. Khorrami, Z. Vaseghi, “Lipase Production in Solid State Fermentation Using Aspergillus Niger: Response Surface Methodology”, IJE Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 25, No. 3,pp.1 51-159, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2012.25.03b.01

N. Aslan, Y. Cebeci, “Application of Box–Behnken design and response surface methodology for modeling of some Turkish coals”, Fuel, Vol. 86, pp. 90-97, 2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.06.010

M. A. Kalam, A. A. Khan, S. Khan, A. Almalik, A. Alshamsan, “Optimizing indomethacin-loaded chitosan nanoparticle size, encapsulation, and release using Box–Behnken experimental design”, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Vol. 87, pp.329-340, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.033

Y. Ding, J. Zheng, X. Xia, T. Ren, J. Kan, “Box–Behnken design for the optimization of nanoscale retrograded starch formation by high-power ultrasonication”, LWT-Food Science and Technology, Vol. 67, pp. 206-213, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.022

M. Balasubramanian, “Application of Box–Behnken design for fabrication of titanium alloy and 304 stainless steel joints with silver interlayer by diffusion bonding”, Materials & Design, Vol. 77, pp. 161–169, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.003

G. E. P. Box, K. B. Wilson, “On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions (with discussion)”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B13, Vol. 1, pp.1-45, 1951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x

W. A. A. Alqaraghuli, A. F. M. Alkarkhi, H. C. Low, “Fitting Second-order Models to Mixed Two-level and Four-level Factorial Designs:Is There an Easier Procedure?”, IJE Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 28, No. 11, pp.1644-1650, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2015.28.11b.12

M. A. Bezerra, R. E. Santelli, E. P. Oliveira, L. S. Villar, “Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry”, Talanta, Vol. 76, pp.965-977 ,2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019

S. L. C. Ferreira, R. E. Bruns, H. S. Ferreira, G. D. Matos, J. M. David, “Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods”, Analytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 597, No. 2, pp. 179-186, 2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011

J. Lee, G. L. Fenves, “Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 124, pp. 892-900, 1998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)

H. Wang, S. Liu, Z. Zhang, “Seismic Performance and Effects of Different Joint Shapes for Unbonded Precast Segmental Bridge Columns”, Journal of Mechanics, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 427-433, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmech.2016.22

O. Saghaeian, F. Nateghi, O. Rezaifar, “Comparison of using Different Modeling Techniques on Prediction of the Nonlinear Behavior of R/C Shear Walls”, IJE Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 269-282, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2014.27.02b.11

Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, M. Chen, G. Chen, “Numerical simulation of ultra- strength concrete-filled steel columns”, Engineering Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 211-217, 2013

B. A. Suprenant, Curvature ductility of reinforced and prestressed concrete columns, Bozeman: Montana State University, 1984

A. Namdar, X. Feng, “Economical considerations in the development of construction materials-a review”, Engineering Review, Vol. 35, No. 3,pp. 291-297, 2015

Metrics

Abstract Views: 458
PDF Downloads: 111

Metrics Information
Bookmark and Share